An Atheistic Argument from Naturalistic Explanations of Religious Belief: A Preliminary Reply to Robert Nola

Robert Nola has recently defended an argument against the existence of God on the basis of naturalistic explanations of religious belief. I will critically evaluate his argument in this paper. Nola’s argument takes the form of an inference to the best explanation: since the naturalistic stance offer...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Kwan, Kai Man (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: MDPI 2022
In: Religions
Jahr: 2022, Band: 13, Heft: 11
weitere Schlagwörter:B hypersensitive agency detection device
B Robert Nola
B cognitive science of religion
B naturalistic explanation of religious belief
Online Zugang: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1822042445
003 DE-627
005 20221111223952.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221111s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3390/rel13111084  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1822042445 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1822042445 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1144411793  |0 (DE-627)1004754620  |0 (DE-576)495388130  |4 aut  |a Kwan, Kai Man 
109 |a Kwan, Kai Man  |a Kwan, Kai-man  |a Kai Man Kwan  |a Guan, Qiwen  |a Guan Qi wen 
245 1 0 |a An Atheistic Argument from Naturalistic Explanations of Religious Belief: A Preliminary Reply to Robert Nola 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Robert Nola has recently defended an argument against the existence of God on the basis of naturalistic explanations of religious belief. I will critically evaluate his argument in this paper. Nola’s argument takes the form of an inference to the best explanation: since the naturalistic stance offers a better explanation of religious belief relative to the theistic explanation, the ontology of God(s) is eliminated. I rebut Nola’s major assumption that naturalistic explanations and theistic explanations of religion are incompatible. I go on to criticize Nola’s proposed naturalistic explanations: Freudianism, a Hypersensitive Agency Detection Device, and a Moralising Mind-Policing God. I find these inadequate as actual explanations of religious belief. Even if they are correct, they will not show that theism is false. So Nola’s argument fails to convince. 
601 |a Argumentation 
650 4 |a hypersensitive agency detection device 
650 4 |a cognitive science of religion 
650 4 |a naturalistic explanation of religious belief 
650 4 |a Robert Nola 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religions  |d Basel : MDPI, 2010  |g 13(2022), 11, Artikel-ID 1084  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)665435797  |w (DE-600)2620962-7  |w (DE-576)348219067  |x 2077-1444  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:13  |g year:2022  |g number:11  |g elocationid:1084 
856 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/11/1084/pdf?version=1668078688  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13111084  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/11/1084  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 13  |j 2022  |e 11  |i 1084 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4209291803 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1822042445 
LOK |0 005 20221111052530 
LOK |0 008 221111||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-10#75F05F980249F5512B2C59030C47D56A8FFA5479 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL