QUMRAN EXEGESIS: "REWRITTEN TORAH" OR INTERPRETATION?

This paper demonstrates that there are both affinities and dissimilarities in the exegetical methods used by the Rabbis and the Qumran sages. Both groups attempted to resolve apparent inconsistencies, lacunae and similar irregularities in the biblical texts; both believed in the infallibility of God...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Heger, Paul 1924-2018 (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Peeters 2005
In: Revue de Qumran
Year: 2005, Volume: 22, Issue: 1, Pages: 61-87
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1821513517
003 DE-627
005 20221214162036.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221110s2005 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1821513517 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1821513517 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)129237515  |0 (DE-627)391462423  |0 (DE-576)297555502  |4 aut  |a Heger, Paul  |d 1924-2018 
109 |a Heger, Paul 1924-2018 
245 1 0 |a QUMRAN EXEGESIS: "REWRITTEN TORAH" OR INTERPRETATION? 
264 1 |c 2005 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper demonstrates that there are both affinities and dissimilarities in the exegetical methods used by the Rabbis and the Qumran sages. Both groups attempted to resolve apparent inconsistencies, lacunae and similar irregularities in the biblical texts; both believed in the infallibility of God's utterances; and both attempted to resolve this contradiction by revealing the divine intention using various exegetical methods. The overall system used by each group was quite similar, despite the fact that each group often reached halakhic conclusions that were not only quite different from each other but also contrary to the plain meaning of the biblical text. I thus argue that divergent halakhic conclusions need not be the result of different exegetical systems, but rather due to the different employment of particular methods (also common in rabbinic disputes), as well as a different philosophy-theology. Neither the Mishnah nor Qumran writings reveal their exegetical methods. Without the Midreshei Halakhah and amoraic discussions, we would be unable to reveal the biblical sources assumed to be the bases of mishnaic halakhot and the exegetical methods used to derive them. For the Qumran material there is no such assistance; we can thus only speculate on the textual problems behind their decisions. The most significant difference between the rabbinic and qumranic exegesis is the qumranic principle of divine revelation as the source of interpretation. I thus challenge Fraade's contention that revelation logically eliminates exegesis. 
601 |a Interpretation 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Revue de Qumran  |d Leuven : Peeters, 1958  |g Tome 22, Fascicule 1 (2005) = Numéro 85, Seite 61-87  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)85763870X  |w (DE-600)2854158-3  |w (DE-576)469131306  |x 2506-7567  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:22  |g year:2005  |g number:1  |g pages:61-87 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1645327361  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/24640815  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo  |a BIIN 
936 u w |d 22  |j 2005  |e 1  |h 61-87  |y Tome 22, Fascicule 1 (2005) = Numéro 85, Seite 61-87 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
CAN |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4208317574 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1821513517 
LOK |0 005 20221110053028 
LOK |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#FA0F6D51B55EC9DA98DDF3DD750CFC0F241AF83F 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a CAN  |a BIB  |a REL