Underdetermination in Late Postclassical Ḥanafī Legal Theories
Abstract This article argues that Ḥanafī uṣūlīs of the later phases of the postclassical period understood uṣūl to be universal propositions that were underdetermined with respect to their evidentiary bases. Though the purpose of such propositions was to confer actionable certainty to particular leg...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2018
|
| In: |
Oriens
Year: 2018, Volume: 46, Issue: 1/2, Pages: 129-158 |
| Further subjects: | B
Uṣūl al-fiqh
B Logic B Ḥanafī B India B postclassical |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1821437896 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221116162837.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221110s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/18778372-04601004 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1821437896 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1821437896 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Ahmed, Asad Q. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Underdetermination in Late Postclassical Ḥanafī Legal Theories |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract This article argues that Ḥanafī uṣūlīs of the later phases of the postclassical period understood uṣūl to be universal propositions that were underdetermined with respect to their evidentiary bases. Though the purpose of such propositions was to confer actionable certainty to particular legal effects, the later tradition imagined the main charge of uṣūl al-fiqh on a meta-theoretic level, i.e., to determine how such propositions could themselves be suitably grounded. In casting the discourse within the framework of naturalized technical methods and distinctions from fields of logic and philosophy, the tradition generally granted the relational and systemic validity of each proposition in terms of the grounding it received from another underdetermined proposition. This second-order perspective of the tradition reveals that uṣūl were systemically and relationally valid, but individually underdetermined. Thus the application of the attribute of relational validity to them and to the effects for which they are serviceable is apt. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Logic | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ḥanafī | |
| 650 | 4 | |a India | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Uṣūl al-fiqh | |
| 650 | 4 | |a postclassical | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Logic | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ḥanafī | |
| 650 | 4 | |a India | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Uṣūl al-fiqh | |
| 650 | 4 | |a postclassical | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Oriens |d Leiden [u.a.] : Brill, 1948 |g 46(2018), 1/2, Seite 129-158 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)504272314 |w (DE-600)2213264-8 |w (DE-576)251711080 |x 1877-8372 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:46 |g year:2018 |g number:1/2 |g pages:129-158 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/26572339 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1163/18778372-04601004 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://brill.com/view/journals/orie/46/1-2/article-p129_4.xml |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 46 |j 2018 |e 1/2 |h 129-158 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4208241942 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1821437896 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221116162837 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-03#2BF84A57D6C90683F601B0147366C731679AAC5C | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/26572339 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Uṣūl al-fiqh |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Uṣūl al-fiqh,Usul al-Fiqh,Usul al-Fiqh |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Usul al-fiqh |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Uṣūl al-fiqh,Usul al-fiqh,Usul al-fiqh |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Usul al-fiqh |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Усуль аль-фикх |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ουσούλ αλ-φικχ |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Uṣūl al-fiḳh,ʿIlm al-uṣūl,أصول الفقه , Uṣūl al-fiḳh,ʿIlm al-uṣūl,أصول الفقه |