A dilemma for wolterstorff’s theistic grounding of human dignity and rights

In a number of recent works, Nicholas Wolterstorff defends the claim that human rights inhere in the dignity of every human. He further contends that the explanation of this dignity cannot be found in the intrinsic features of humans; rather, the only plausible explanation for human dignity is that...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wessling, Jordan (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2014
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2014, Volume: 76, Issue: 3, Pages: 277-295
Further subjects:B Dignity
B Rights
B God and morality
B Wolterstorff
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1821425332
003 DE-627
005 20221111223606.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221110s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11153-014-9460-7  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1821425332 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1821425332 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1069497096  |0 (DE-627)821934708  |0 (DE-576)429176260  |4 aut  |a Wessling, Jordan 
109 |a Wessling, Jordan 
245 1 2 |a A dilemma for wolterstorff’s theistic grounding of human dignity and rights 
264 1 |c 2014 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In a number of recent works, Nicholas Wolterstorff defends the claim that human rights inhere in the dignity of every human. He further contends that the explanation of this dignity cannot be found in the intrinsic features of humans; rather, the only plausible explanation for human dignity is that it is bestowed upon humans by God’s love. In this paper, I argue that Wolterstorff’s theory concerning the ground of human dignity falls prey to something quite similar to the classic Euthyphro dilemma: either God must love every existing human in a dignity-bestowing manner or he need not, and either option is problematic. If the former, then whatever it is about humans that ensures God’s love can reasonably be thought to be the independent source of human dignity and/or rights, thereby leaving us without cause to appeal to God’s love for the explanation of this dignity. If the latter, the implication is that moral statements which appear to be necessarily true are only contingently so. Wolterstorff’s theory will thus require substantial modification, or else abandonment. 
601 |a Dilemma 
650 4 |a Wolterstorff 
650 4 |a God and morality 
650 4 |a Dignity 
650 4 |a Rights 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for philosophy of religion  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1970  |g 76(2014), 3, Seite 277-295  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320442098  |w (DE-600)2005049-5  |w (DE-576)103746927  |x 1572-8684  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:76  |g year:2014  |g number:3  |g pages:277-295 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/24709278  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-014-9460-7  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 76  |j 2014  |e 3  |h 277-295 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4208229349 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1821425332 
LOK |0 005 20221110052753 
LOK |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#D318D96215CFF353ACD2DFDB231E27385AAB9C39 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/24709278 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL