‘Byrne’s’ religious pluralism

“(1) All major religious traditions are equal in respect of making common reference to a single transcendent sacred reality. (2) All major traditions are likewise equal in respect of offering some means or other to human salvation. (3) All traditions are to be seen as containing revisable, limited,...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal for philosophy of religion
Main Author: Mawson, T. J. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2005
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Further subjects:B Religious Tradition
B Common Reference
B Major Tradition
B Religious Pluralism
B Major Religious Tradition
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1821424905
003 DE-627
005 20221110052752.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221110s2005 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11153-005-6465-2  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1821424905 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1821424905 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Mawson, T. J.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Mawson, T. J. 
245 1 0 |a ‘Byrne’s’ religious pluralism 
264 1 |c 2005 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a “(1) All major religious traditions are equal in respect of making common reference to a single transcendent sacred reality. (2) All major traditions are likewise equal in respect of offering some means or other to human salvation. (3) All traditions are to be seen as containing revisable, limited, accounts of the nature of the sacred none is certain enough in its particular dogmatic formulations to provide the norm for interpreting the others.” P. Byrne, Prolegomena to Religious Pluralism (NY: Macmillan, 1995), p. 12. In this paper, I argue that of the three claims that constitute the form of Religious Pluralism outlined by Peter Byrne in his Prolegomena to Religious Pluralism, the first is something proponents of the theory can’t think of themselves as having the resources to defend; the second is something that is in danger of being rendered trivial by the definition of religions offered; however, if one makes it non-trivial, it becomes implausible (and offering a defence of it inconsistent with other elements of the theory); and, even if the first half of the third is right, the second half is wrong. 
650 4 |a Major Religious Tradition 
650 4 |a Major Tradition 
650 4 |a Religious Pluralism 
650 4 |a Common Reference 
650 4 |a Religious Tradition 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for philosophy of religion  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1970  |g 58(2005), 1, Seite 37-54  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320442098  |w (DE-600)2005049-5  |w (DE-576)103746927  |x 1572-8684  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:58  |g year:2005  |g number:1  |g pages:37-54 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40012786  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-005-6465-2  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 58  |j 2005  |e 1  |h 37-54 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4208228911 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1821424905 
LOK |0 005 20221110052752 
LOK |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#61150EE82E5A1C5EF57C0EE54F7ECEBDFAA393B0 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40012786 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL