Moral antitheodicy: prospects and problems
Proponents of the view which I call ‘moral antitheodicy’ call for the theistic discourse of theodicy to be abandoned, because, they claim, all theodicies involve some form of moral impropriety. Three arguments in support of this view are examined: the argument from insensitivity, the argument from d...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2008
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2008, Volume: 65, Issue: 3, Pages: 153 |
| Further subjects: | B
Antitheodicy
B Theodicy B Moral critique B problem of evil B Hick B D. Z B Phillips |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 182142462X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221110052751.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221110s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-008-9189-2 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)182142462X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP182142462X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Simpson, Robert Mark |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Moral antitheodicy: prospects and problems |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2008 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Proponents of the view which I call ‘moral antitheodicy’ call for the theistic discourse of theodicy to be abandoned, because, they claim, all theodicies involve some form of moral impropriety. Three arguments in support of this view are examined: the argument from insensitivity, the argument from detachment, and the argument from harmful consequences. After discussing the merits of each argument individually, I attempt to show that they all must presuppose what they are intended to establish, namely, that the set of premises advanced in any given theodicy will be untenable. I conclude by discussing what uses there might be for the moral critique of theodicy, if it cannot be used to ground a global rejection of theodical practice. | ||
| 601 | |a Problem | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a J | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Hick | |
| 650 | 4 | |a D. Z | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Phillips | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Moral critique | |
| 650 | 4 | |a problem of evil | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Antitheodicy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Theodicy | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1970 |g 65(2008), 3, Seite 153 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:65 |g year:2008 |g number:3 |g pages:153 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n elektronische Ausgabe |w (DE-627)1646896726 |k Electronic | ||
| 856 | |u https://philpapers.org/archive/SIMMAP-4.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-008-9189-2 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 65 |j 2008 |e 3 |h 153 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4208228636 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 182142462X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221110052751 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#7F57BBD1D3DEC30C302757247E796B9E8C6D9579 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||