Fine-tuning as evidence for a multiverse: why White is wrong

Roger White (God and design, Routledge, London, 2003) claims that while the fine-tuning of our universe, \(\alpha \), may count as evidence for a designer, it cannot count as evidence for a multiverse. First, I will argue that his considerations are only correct, if at all, for a limited set of mult...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Saward, Mark Douglas (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2013
Dans: International journal for philosophy of religion
Année: 2013, Volume: 73, Numéro: 3, Pages: 243-253
Sujets non-standardisés:B Design
B Multiverses
B God
B Fine-tuning argument
Accès en ligne: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Édition parallèle:Électronique
Description
Résumé:Roger White (God and design, Routledge, London, 2003) claims that while the fine-tuning of our universe, \(\alpha \), may count as evidence for a designer, it cannot count as evidence for a multiverse. First, I will argue that his considerations are only correct, if at all, for a limited set of multiverses that have particular features. As a result, I will argue that his claim cannot be generalised as a statement about all multiverses. This failure to generalise, I will argue, is also a feature of design hypotheses. That is, design hypotheses can likewise be made insensitive or sensitive to the evidence of fine-tuning as we please. Second, I will argue that White is mistaken about the role that this evidence plays in fine-tuning discussions. That is, even if the evidence of fine-tuning appears to support one particular hypothesis more strongly than another, this does not always help us in deciding which hypothesis to prefer.
ISSN:1572-8684
Contient:Enthalten in: International journal for philosophy of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s11153-013-9395-4