Deliberate commission of category mistake. Crombie vs. Ryle
Crombie's acceptance of the deliberate commission of a category mistake in his defense of the meaningfulness of theological statements raises a pointed challenge to the philosophy of Ryle which seems not to have been specifically addressed in subsequent literature. We review the analysis which...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
1987
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 1987, Volume: 21, Issue: 1, Pages: 39-46 |
| Further subjects: | B
Category Mistake
B Basic Difference B Pointed Challenge B Subsequent Literature B Distinct Contribution |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1821421876 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221110052743.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221110s1987 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/BF00142175 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1821421876 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1821421876 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Bashor, Philip |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Deliberate commission of category mistake. Crombie vs. Ryle |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1987 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Crombie's acceptance of the deliberate commission of a category mistake in his defense of the meaningfulness of theological statements raises a pointed challenge to the philosophy of Ryle which seems not to have been specifically addressed in subsequent literature. We review the analysis which leads Crombie into it, including concepts of anomaly, deficiency, affinity, and inadequate notion, noting basic differences in method and attitude from Ryle. We express our own agreements and disagreements in keeping with an overall concern for the preservation of rationality in this sphere of language, finding acceptable distinct contributions to that end from both. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Pointed Challenge | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Subsequent Literature | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Category Mistake | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Distinct Contribution | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Basic Difference | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Farid, Arifa |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1970 |g 21(1987), 1, Seite 39-46 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:21 |g year:1987 |g number:1 |g pages:39-46 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1640064052 |k Non-Electronic | ||
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40036376 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142175 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 21 |j 1987 |e 1 |h 39-46 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4208225882 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1821421876 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221110052743 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#76A3B5D5A6E08C7FA0430A03714C1EC42D9B2150 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40036376 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||