The right to believe truth paradoxes of moral regret for no belief and the role(s) of logic in philosophy of religion
I offer you some theories of intellectual obligations and rights (virtue Ethics): initially, RBT (a Right to Believe Truth, if something is true it follows one has a right to believe it), and, NDSM (one has no right to believe a contradiction, i.e., No right to commit Doxastic Self-Mutilation). Evid...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2012
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2012, Volume: 72, Issue: 2, Pages: 115-138 |
| Further subjects: | B
Intellectual obligation
B Deontic logics B Concepts of belief B Variations on Clifford’s thesis B Categorical moral truth B Moral regret for no faith B Modal logics B Philosophy of religion and philosophy B Virtue Ethics B Necessity and time |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|