Kant’s sacrificial turns
This paper addresses the role of the notion of sacrifice in Kant’s theoretical philosophy, practical philosophy, and in his account of religion. First, I argue that kenotic sacrifice, or sacrifice as ‘withdrawal’, plays a hidden and yet important role in the development of Kant’s transcendental phil...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2013
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2013, Volume: 73, Issue: 2, Pages: 97-115 |
| Further subjects: | B
Perspectivism
B Immanuel Kant B Sacrifice B Kenosis |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1821414209 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221110052717.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221110s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-012-9380-3 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1821414209 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1821414209 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Bubbio, Paolo Diego |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Kant’s sacrificial turns |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2013 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This paper addresses the role of the notion of sacrifice in Kant’s theoretical philosophy, practical philosophy, and in his account of religion. First, I argue that kenotic sacrifice, or sacrifice as ‘withdrawal’, plays a hidden and yet important role in the development of Kant’s transcendental philosophy. Second, I focus on Kant’s practical philosophy, arguing that the notion of sacrifice that is both implied and explicitly analyzed by Kant is mainly suppressive sacrifice. However, Kant’s account is fundamentally ambiguous, as sometimes the kenotic meaning of sacrifice seems to resurface, especially in the context of Kant’s discussion of the happiness of others as an end in itself. Because religious notions are regarded by Kant as necessary transitional forms (Darstellungen) to be used to make moral ideas applicable to the world, I then scrutinize Kant’s view of sacrifice as an improper symbol, and I analyze Kant’s arguments for such a dismissal and discuss the subject matter in recent literature. Finally, I examine the role of sacrifice in Kant’s account of Christ as the prototype of pure moral disposition. I conclude by arguing that Kant indeed grasped the importance of including kenotic dynamics in practical philosophy but was somehow unable or unwilling to integrate it into the formal grounding of his ethics. This tension, however, effectively provides an entry point for features that can be found in the post-Kantians. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Kenosis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Perspectivism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sacrifice | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Immanuel Kant | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1970 |g 73(2013), 2, Seite 97-115 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:73 |g year:2013 |g number:2 |g pages:97-115 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/24709212 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-012-9380-3 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 73 |j 2013 |e 2 |h 97-115 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4208218215 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1821414209 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221110052717 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#7269710DFA333F6950D2E1F29EFC719D028F6E6E | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/24709212 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Kenosis,Kenosis |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Kénose,Kénose |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Quenosis,Quenosis |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Kenosi <motivo>,Kenosi,Chenosi,Chenosi,Chenosi (motivo),Chenosi |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 虚己说,虚己说,虚己论,虚己论 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 虛己說,虛己說,虛己論,虛己論 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Quenosis,Quenosis |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Кенозис (мотив),Кенозис |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Κένωση (μοτίβο),Κένωση |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Kenose,Selbstentäußerung Christi,Kenosis-Christologie,Kenotische Christologie |