Aquinas and quantifier mistakes
In his “Third Way” Aquinas appears to argue in a way that relies upon shifting quantifiers in a fallacious way. Some have tried to save this and other parts of the “Third Way” by introducing sophisticated logical and metaphysical machinery. Alternatively, Aquinas’ apparently fallacious quantifier sh...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2012
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Jahr: 2012, Band: 71, Heft: 2, Seiten: 137-143 |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Validity
B Aristotelian physics B Five Ways B Aquinas B Quantifier shift B Implicit premises |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallele Ausgabe: | Elektronisch
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1821413172 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221110052713.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221110s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-010-9281-2 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1821413172 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1821413172 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a John, Anders |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Aquinas and quantifier mistakes |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2012 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In his “Third Way” Aquinas appears to argue in a way that relies upon shifting quantifiers in a fallacious way. Some have tried to save this and other parts of the “Third Way” by introducing sophisticated logical and metaphysical machinery. Alternatively, Aquinas’ apparently fallacious quantifier shift can be seen to be part of a valid argument if we supply a simple premise which an Aristotelian natural philosopher would surely hold. In this short paper, I consider candidates for this premise, defend a specific premise, and from that discussion draw a moral about quantifier predicate logic. I conclude that Aristotelian natural philosophy is more than an historical backdrop to Aquinas’ arguments. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Implicit premises | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Validity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Aristotelian physics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Five Ways | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Quantifier shift | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Aquinas | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1970 |g 71(2012), 2, Seite 137-143 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:71 |g year:2012 |g number:2 |g pages:137-143 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n elektronische Ausgabe |w (DE-627)1646895185 |k Electronic | ||
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/41474840 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-010-9281-2 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 71 |j 2012 |e 2 |h 137-143 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4208217189 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1821413172 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221110052713 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#4018D753C88D6C5BC4DF268234A15419814F6FFC | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/41474840 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||