Assessing a Revised Compensation Theodicy

Attempts to resolve the problem of evil often appeal to a greater good, according to which God’s permission of moral and natural evil is justified because (and just in case) the evil that is permitted is necessary for the realization of some greater good. In the extensive litany of greater good theo...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Reichenbach, Bruce R. 1943- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: MDPI 2022
In: Religions
Year: 2022, Volume: 13, Issue: 11
Further subjects:B Justice
B Compensation
B Theodicy
B problem of evil
B Animal Suffering
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1821408535
003 DE-627
005 20221111223546.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221110s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3390/rel13111080  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1821408535 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1821408535 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1052572782  |0 (DE-627)788666991  |0 (DE-576)162684959  |4 aut  |a Reichenbach, Bruce R.  |d 1943- 
109 |a Reichenbach, Bruce R. 1943- 
245 1 0 |a Assessing a Revised Compensation Theodicy 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Attempts to resolve the problem of evil often appeal to a greater good, according to which God’s permission of moral and natural evil is justified because (and just in case) the evil that is permitted is necessary for the realization of some greater good. In the extensive litany of greater good theodicies and defenses, the appeal to the greater good of an afterlife of infinite reward or pleasure has played a minor role in Christian thought but a more important role in Islamic thought. In a recent article, Seyyed Jaaber Mousavirad invites us to reconsider the greater good theodicy of compensation. He contends that not only are all evils justified in that God compensates the sufferer in an afterlife, but because the evils experienced produce some good, God has reason for bringing about or allowing evils in the first place. In what follows, I argue that this modified compensation theodicy is flawed in its premises, faces serious problems with its concept of justice, treats people as means only and not as intrinsically valuable, and ultimately fails to show that an afterlife compensation, along with some good produced here and now by evil, justify God bringing about or allowing evil. 
650 4 |a Animal Suffering 
650 4 |a Compensation 
650 4 |a Justice 
650 4 |a problem of evil 
650 4 |a Theodicy 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religions  |d Basel : MDPI, 2010  |g 13(2022), 11, Artikel-ID 1080  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)665435797  |w (DE-600)2620962-7  |w (DE-576)348219067  |x 2077-1444  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:13  |g year:2022  |g number:11  |g elocationid:1080 
856 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/11/1080/pdf?version=1668737205  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13111080  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/11/1080  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 13  |j 2022  |e 11  |i 1080 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4208212519 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1821408535 
LOK |0 005 20221110052654 
LOK |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-09#E51095DF56D16A552E4461FF3DFF8F73D7672CA6 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL