Are there de jure objections to Mādhvic belief?
Recently, Erik Baldwin and Tyler McNabb have brought Madhva's epistemological framework into active dialogue with Alvin Plantinga's religious epistemology and have argued that individuals within Madhva's tradition cannot make full use of Plantinga's epistemology, according to whi...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2022
|
| In: |
Religious studies
Year: 2022, Volume: 58, Issue: 4, Pages: 732-744 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Plantinga, Alvin 1932-
/ Mādhvas
/ Cognition theory
/ Theism
/ Justification (Philosophy)
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism BK Hinduism, Jainism, Sikhism FA Theology |
| Further subjects: | B
Alvin Plantinga
B Mādhva B warrant B Reformed Epistemology B Vedanta |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1820774066 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230803082321.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221104s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0034412521000251 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1820774066 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1820774066 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1145636187 |0 (DE-627)1006834699 |0 (DE-576)166058173 |4 aut |a Dattagupta, Akṣaẏakumāra | |
| 109 | |a Dattagupta, Akṣaẏakumāra |a Dutta Gupta, Akshay Kumar |a Gupta, Akshoy Kumar Dutta |a Gupta, Akṣaẏakumāra Datta | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Are there de jure objections to Mādhvic belief? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Recently, Erik Baldwin and Tyler McNabb have brought Madhva's epistemological framework into active dialogue with Alvin Plantinga's religious epistemology and have argued that individuals within Madhva's tradition cannot make full use of Plantinga's epistemology, according to which, Christian belief resists de jure objections and can also have warrant. While I do not contest this specific claim, I demonstrate that an analysis of Madhva's epistemological framework reveals that this framework has its own resources through which it can resist de jure objections. I address various objections to the rationality of Mādhvic belief and conclude that there are no de jure objections to Mādhvic belief that are independent of de facto objections. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Alvin Plantinga | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Mādhva | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Vedānta | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Reformed Epistemology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a warrant | |
| 652 | |a AB:BK:FA | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d p |0 (DE-588)119153114 |0 (DE-627)079948650 |0 (DE-576)211419141 |2 gnd |a Plantinga, Alvin |d 1932- |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4300497-0 |0 (DE-627)700172246 |0 (DE-576)211030147 |2 gnd |a Mādhvas |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4070914-0 |0 (DE-627)106099086 |0 (DE-576)209182261 |2 gnd |a Erkenntnistheorie |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4059729-5 |0 (DE-627)10614250X |0 (DE-576)209131942 |2 gnd |a Theismus |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4138650-4 |0 (DE-627)10564109X |0 (DE-576)209687851 |2 gnd |a Rechtfertigung |g Philosophie |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religious studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 |g 58(2022), 4, Seite 732-744 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)265785405 |w (DE-600)1466479-3 |w (DE-576)079718671 |x 1469-901X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:58 |g year:2022 |g number:4 |g pages:732-744 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412521000251 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/are-there-de-jure-objections-to-madhvic-belief/A9EF938E2EC5E702EA58B8BDA8497B1E |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 58 |j 2022 |e 4 |h 732-744 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4206553211 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1820774066 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230803082321 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221104||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043571 |a BK | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044020 |a FA | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Cognition theory,Epistemology,Theory of knowledge,Knowledge,Mādhvas,Theism,Vedanta |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Mādhva,Théisme,Théorie de la connaissance,Épistémologie,Védanta |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Epistemología,Madhvas,Teísmo,Vedanta |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Epistemologia,Teoria epistemiologica,Teoria epistemiologica,Seguaci di Madhva,Teismo,Vedanta |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 吠檀多,有神论,知识论,认识论 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 吠檀多,有神論,知識論,認識論 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Epistemologia,Madhvas,Teísmo,Vedanta |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Веданта,Последователи Мадхвы,Теизм,Теория познания |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Mādhvas,Βεδάντα,Βεντάντα,Γνωσιολογία,Γνωσιοθεωρία,Επιστημολογία,Θεϊσμός |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Wedanta |
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Plantinga, Alvin C.,1932- , Madhwa-Sekte,Mādhavas , Epistemologie,Epistologie,Erkenntnisphilosophie,Gnoseologie,Epistemologie,Epistologie,Erkenntnislehre,Erkenntnisphilosophie,Gnoseologie |