The muʿtazila's arguments against divine command theory

The Muʿtazilī theologians, particularly the later Imāmī ones, developed numerous interesting arguments against divine command theory. The arguments, however, have not received the attention they deserve. Some of the arguments have been discussed in passing, and some have not been discussed at all. I...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Nebentitel:Special issue: "The Existence and Nature of Deities"
1. VerfasserIn: Morvarid, Hashem (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Cambridge Univ. Press 2022
In: Religious studies
Jahr: 2022, Band: 58, Heft: 3, Seiten: 610-627
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen):B Mutasiliten / Voluntarismus / Theologie / Metaethik / Geschichte 1200-1500
RelBib Classification:AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus
BJ Islam
FA Theologie
NCA Ethik
TG Hochmittelalter
TH Spätmittelalter
weitere Schlagwörter:B The Ashāʿira
B Morality
B Divine Command Theory
B The Imāmī
B The Muʿtazila
B Sharia
B God
B The Late Kalām Period
B Reason
Online Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The Muʿtazilī theologians, particularly the later Imāmī ones, developed numerous interesting arguments against divine command theory. The arguments, however, have not received the attention they deserve. Some of the arguments have been discussed in passing, and some have not been discussed at all. In this article, I aim to present and analyse the arguments. To that end, I first distinguish between different semantic, ontological, epistemological, and theological theses that were often conflated in the debate, and examine the logical relation among them. Then I go over the Muʿtazila's arguments determining, among other things, which of the theses was targeted by each argument. In presenting the arguments, I focus mainly on the late kalām period, the period falling roughly between the thirteenth and fifteenth centuries of the common era, as the arguments were at their most sophisticated level by this time.
ISSN:1469-901X
Enthält:Enthalten in: Religious studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0034412521000172