Navigating Colonial Power: Challenging Precedents and the Limitation of Local Elites

Abstract In 1869, the British allowed Muslims to sit as judges on the High Court. This article explores the legal opinions of the first Muslim judge to be appointed to the High Court, Syed Mahmood. Straddling two competing worlds – that of Cambridge University and that of his native India – Justice...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Siddiqui, Sohaira Z. M. (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Brill 2019
Dans: Islamic law and society
Année: 2019, Volume: 26, Numéro: 3, Pages: 272-312
Sujets non-standardisés:B precedent
B Islamic Law
B ANGLO-MUHAMMADAN LAW
B Syed Mahmood
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1820638995
003 DE-627
005 20221103223728.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221103s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/15685195-02612A03  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1820638995 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1820638995 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1140592688  |0 (DE-627)898579430  |0 (DE-576)493890564  |4 aut  |a Siddiqui, Sohaira Z. M. 
109 |a Siddiqui, Sohaira Z. M.  |a Siddiqui, Sohaira  |a Ṣiddīqī, Suhaira 
245 1 0 |a Navigating Colonial Power: Challenging Precedents and the Limitation of Local Elites 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Abstract In 1869, the British allowed Muslims to sit as judges on the High Court. This article explores the legal opinions of the first Muslim judge to be appointed to the High Court, Syed Mahmood. Straddling two competing worlds – that of Cambridge University and that of his native India – Justice Mahmood both legitimated and resisted colonial judicial power. In this essay I will demonstrate how British judges interpreted points of Islamic law within an English legal framework, and how these interpretations contradicted their translated texts of Islamic law, yet became the foundation of legal precedents established through the doctrine of stare decisis. Despite participating within the British colonial judiciary, Mahmood challenged these precedents, demonstrating his ability to navigate the paradoxes of colonial power to secure for himself a legitimate platform from which he could argue his juridical interventions. The efficacy of these challenges, however, ultimately was restrained by the institutions and structures of the colonial jural project. 
601 |a Challenger 
650 4 |a Syed Mahmood 
650 4 |a precedent 
650 4 |a Islamic Law 
650 4 |a ANGLO-MUHAMMADAN LAW 
650 4 |a Syed Mahmood 
650 4 |a precedent 
650 4 |a Islamic Law 
650 4 |a ANGLO-MUHAMMADAN LAW 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Islamic law and society  |d Leiden [u.a.] : Brill, 1994  |g 26(2019), 3, Seite 272-312  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)32444639X  |w (DE-600)2036948-7  |w (DE-576)099025817  |x 1568-5195  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:26  |g year:2019  |g number:3  |g pages:272-312 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-02612A03  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/ils/26/3/article-p272_1.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 26  |j 2019  |e 3  |h 272-312 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4205890303 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1820638995 
LOK |0 005 20221103052711 
LOK |0 008 221103||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-22#FA9F6A1FB7BFFC65E89BD824830B1D81C4536FCF 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL