“Law and Economics” Literature and Ottoman Legal Studies
This article considers the relevance of hypotheses developed in the “law and economics” literature regarding settlement-trial decisions in the Ottoman Empire. In particular, it explores the applicability of the “selection principle” and “50 percent plaintiff win-rate” formulated by George Priest and...
| Auteurs: | ; |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill
2014
|
| Dans: |
Islamic law and society
Année: 2014, Volume: 21, Numéro: 1/2, Pages: 114-144 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Settlement
B Kastamonu B Litigation B sulh B “law and economics” B “plaintiff-win rate” B Benjamin Klein B George Priest B “selection principle” B Ottoman |
| Accès en ligne: |
Accès probablement gratuit Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | This article considers the relevance of hypotheses developed in the “law and economics” literature regarding settlement-trial decisions in the Ottoman Empire. In particular, it explores the applicability of the “selection principle” and “50 percent plaintiff win-rate” formulated by George Priest and Benjamin Klein. The article also demonstrates how existing research based on Ottoman court records can contribute to the “law and economics” scholarship, which is dominated by research based on modern, Western contexts. The article utilizes the court records from eighteenth-century Kastamonu to make observations about settlement/litigation decisions in an Ottoman context. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1568-5195 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Islamic law and society
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685195-02112p04 |