Why Did Ümmü Gülsüm Go to Court? Ottoman Legal Practice between History and Anthropology
Abstract This article offers a critical assessment of the existing literature on Ottoman courts of law, which characterizes the court's operations as single-mindedly legalistic and socially disinterested. There is a conceptual discrepancy between this literature and recent legal and anthropolog...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill
2010
|
| Dans: |
Islamic law and society
Année: 2010, Volume: 17, Numéro: 2, Pages: 215-244 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
KAZF
B SICIL B LEGAL PRACTICE (OTTOMAN) B TAHKIM B ZINA B SULH B HAD B COURT |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | Abstract This article offers a critical assessment of the existing literature on Ottoman courts of law, which characterizes the court's operations as single-mindedly legalistic and socially disinterested. There is a conceptual discrepancy between this literature and recent legal and anthropological studies of modern Islamic courts, which highlight the influence on the court's actions of communal considerations, such as the desire to make peace among disputants. With reference to a specific rape incident in eighteenth-century Anatolia, I propose in this article a characterization of Ottoman legal practice that acknowledges the contextual and socially-bounded nature of the court's actions. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1568-5195 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Islamic law and society
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/092893809X12519895111144 |