Central Organisation, Tabarrokāt and Succession among the Early Cheshtis in India
Abstract The paper seeks to re-examine the thesis advanced by some eminent scholars that there was a well established tradition among the early Cheshtis to nominate one of their disciples as chief successor and pass on major part of their spiritual authority to him through the means of transferring...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill
2008
|
| Dans: |
Journal of Persianate studies
Année: 2008, Volume: 1, Numéro: 1, Pages: 67-78 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Hierarchy
B PIR B MORID B SUCCESSION B WELĀYAT B KHALIFA B Sufism |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | Abstract The paper seeks to re-examine the thesis advanced by some eminent scholars that there was a well established tradition among the early Cheshtis to nominate one of their disciples as chief successor and pass on major part of their spiritual authority to him through the means of transferring the tabarrokāt to him that they had received from their masters. But the evidence available on the subject does not support the thesis. Similarly, there is no evidence that a central organisation with pan-Indian character or a well integrated system presided over by the chief successor, ever existed during the early history of the order (selsela). |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1874-7167 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of Persianate studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/187471608784772715 |