Moving Beyond Religious Clichés: A Review
The article reviews the most recent systematic effort to correct some of the widespread misconceptions about religion: Brad Stoddard and Craig Martin’s edited volume Stereotyping Religion: Critiquing Clichés (2017) and Tenzan Eaghll’s article “Religious Clichés” (2015). It argues that the joint goal...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Brill
2022
|
Dans: |
Numen
Année: 2022, Volume: 69, Numéro: 5/6, Pages: 595-628 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Science des religions
/ Cliché
/ Stéréotypes
/ Essentialisme
/ Relativisme
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophie de la religion AD Sociologie des religions |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Ninian Smart
B Essentialism B Relativism B religious clichés B study of religion |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Résumé: | The article reviews the most recent systematic effort to correct some of the widespread misconceptions about religion: Brad Stoddard and Craig Martin’s edited volume Stereotyping Religion: Critiquing Clichés (2017) and Tenzan Eaghll’s article “Religious Clichés” (2015). It argues that the joint goal becomes problematic due to some empirical and logical distortions, which mainly result from the emphasis on the relativist message offsetting the impartial assessment of facts and their implications. It argues for integrating the biological and cultural explanations of religion and offers some proposals toward identifying the contemporary clichés that impede progress in our understanding of the phenomenon. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1568-5276 |
Référence: | Analyse von "Stereotyping religion (London : Bloomsbury Academic, 2017)"
Analyse von "Religion Clichés (2015)" |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Numen
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685276-12341670 |