A Dilemma for Sterba

James Sterba argues that a good God is not logically possible. He argues that what he calls the Pauline Principle, which says that we should never do evil that good may come of it, implies that a good God would prevent horrendous evil consequences of immoral actions. However, there are plenty of exa...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Russell, Bruce (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: MDPI 2022
In: Religions
Year: 2022, Volume: 13, Issue: 9
Further subjects:B Moral Evil Prevention Requirements
B horrendous evil consequences of immoral actions
B Skeptical Theism
B inference to the best explanation
B Doctrine of the Double Effect
B Pauline Principle
B The problem of evil
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1815212152
003 DE-627
005 20220826052533.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220826s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3390/rel13090783  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1815212152 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1815212152 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Russell, Bruce  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 2 |a A Dilemma for Sterba 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a James Sterba argues that a good God is not logically possible. He argues that what he calls the Pauline Principle, which says that we should never do evil that good may come of it, implies that a good God would prevent horrendous evil consequences of immoral actions. However, there are plenty of examples of such actions in our world. So, a good God does not exist. I offer an example from Derek Parfit, and one of my own, that calls the Pauline Principle into question. Sterba believes that what he calls Moral Evil Prevention Requirements (MEPRs) follow from the Pauline Principle, and that they are necessary truths which imply that a good God would prevent horrendous evil consequences of immoral actions. Whether these (MEPRs) follow from the Pauline Principle or do not, they may be necessary truths that could form the basis of Sterba’s argument. However, I argue that they are not necessary truths. If modified to become such, Sterba faces a challenge from the Skeptical Theists that can only be met by turning his argument into an evidential version of the problem of evil. I compare Sterba’s argument with my version of the evidential argument from evil that says that if God exists, there is not excessive, unnecessary suffering and whose second premise says there is. I argue that it is easier to establish that there is excessive, unnecessary suffering than to establish Sterba’s second premise (once his principles are modified). That second premise will say that there are no goods that logically require God to allow immoral actions that have horrendous evil consequences. Sterba faces a dilemma: either he has an unsound logical argument or a weak evidential argument for the non-existence of God. In either case, he does not have a good logical argument for atheism. 
601 |a Dilemma 
650 4 |a inference to the best explanation 
650 4 |a horrendous evil consequences of immoral actions 
650 4 |a Moral Evil Prevention Requirements 
650 4 |a Skeptical Theism 
650 4 |a Doctrine of the Double Effect 
650 4 |a Pauline Principle 
650 4 |a The problem of evil 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religions  |d Basel : MDPI, 2010  |g 13(2022), 9, Artikel-ID 783  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)665435797  |w (DE-600)2620962-7  |w (DE-576)348219067  |x 2077-1444  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:13  |g year:2022  |g number:9  |g elocationid:783 
856 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/9/783/pdf?version=1661430712  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13090783  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/9/783  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 13  |j 2022  |e 9  |i 783 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4182827953 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1815212152 
LOK |0 005 20220826052533 
LOK |0 008 220826||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-08-25#94C909D6F442E02175612B2A482B289BDEFB773F 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL