Human Sovereignty and the Logical Problem of Evil
In this paper, I provide a defence of theism against James Sterba’s version of the logical problem of evil, at least where the focus is on moral evil (I do not have much to say about natural evil in this paper). After giving my own account of the distinction between the logical and evidential proble...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
MDPI
2022
|
| In: |
Religions
Year: 2022, Volume: 13, Issue: 8 |
| Further subjects: | B
Sovereignty
B Sterba B Free Will defence B Free Will theodicy B Evidential problem of evil B logical problem of evil |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1814954244 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220824012112.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220823s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/rel13080766 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1814954244 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1814954244 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1152296930 |0 (DE-627)1013846575 |0 (DE-576)499807421 |4 aut |a Molto, Daniel | |
| 109 | |a Molto, Daniel | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Human Sovereignty and the Logical Problem of Evil |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this paper, I provide a defence of theism against James Sterba’s version of the logical problem of evil, at least where the focus is on moral evil (I do not have much to say about natural evil in this paper). After giving my own account of the distinction between the logical and evidential problems of evil, I set out to argue that Sterba fails to prove atheism. The problem lies with this third premise. I think that there is a possible defence according to which the three ‘Evil Prevention Requirements’ that Sterba endorse are all true but do not support atheism. | ||
| 601 | |a Problem | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Sovereignty | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Free Will defence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Free Will theodicy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sterba | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Evidential problem of evil | |
| 650 | 4 | |a logical problem of evil | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religions |d Basel : MDPI, 2010 |g 13(2022), 8, Artikel-ID 766 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)665435797 |w (DE-600)2620962-7 |w (DE-576)348219067 |x 2077-1444 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:13 |g year:2022 |g number:8 |g elocationid:766 |
| 856 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/8/766/pdf?version=1661161754 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13080766 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/8/766 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 13 |j 2022 |e 8 |i 766 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4182063155 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1814954244 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220823052530 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220823||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-08-22#0C87A982B95D802399448C1F10CE00DC1B9A5FFB | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||