Een doodgewoon Rooms boek?: De Nieuwe Katechismus en de religieuze revolutie van de jaren zestig

After publication of De Nieuwe Katechismus (translated mostly as The Dutch Catechism, literally: The New Catechism) in 1966, a harsh conflict broke out between the authors of the book and the Vatican. According to censors appointed by the Vatican, the book may have not contained heresy, but some par...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Bos, Maarten van den 1984- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Néerlandais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Amsterdam University Press 2021
Dans: Trajecta
Année: 2021, Volume: 30, Numéro: 1, Pages: 87-117
RelBib Classification:CH Christianisme et société
KAJ Époque contemporaine
KBD Benelux
KDB Église catholique romaine
RF Pédagogie religieuse
Sujets non-standardisés:B The Dutch Cathechism
B Dutch Catholicism
B Hoger Katechetisch Instituut
B De Nieuwe Katechismus
B Religious Modernity
Accès en ligne: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Résumé:After publication of De Nieuwe Katechismus (translated mostly as The Dutch Catechism, literally: The New Catechism) in 1966, a harsh conflict broke out between the authors of the book and the Vatican. According to censors appointed by the Vatican, the book may have not contained heresy, but some parts were not in accordance with the Church’s teachings. Three years later, an appendix was published. The appendix was accepted by the Dutch episcopacy, responsible for the book, but the authors remained in opposition. They considered De Nieuwe Katechismus to be nothing more than ‘just another catholic book’. Both in older as more recent studies on (Dutch) Catholicism in the sixties, the conflict on the De Nieuwe Katechismus frequently appears as showcase for the troubled relations between the progressive Dutch church province and the orthodox or conservative powers in the Vatican. Meanwhile, both the conception and content of the book are poorly analysed. In this article, I present a contextualised history of the book and the ideas of its authors of what it meant to be catholic in the modern age. Conclusion is that, in order to truly understand both the religious revolution of the sixties and the provenance of important ideas on self-expression and self-fulfilment that shaped our understanding of modernity after the sixties, we ought to take a closer look on new perspectives on modernity and religion that arose in religious communities after the Second World War. From that perspective, the ideas behind the publication of De Nieuwe Katechismus is of greater historiographical relevance then the conflict that broke out after publication.
ISSN:2665-9484
Contient:Enthalten in: Trajecta
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.5117/TRA2021.1.005.BOS