How Not to Object to Demonic Realism

There are few academics today who actively argue against demonic realism. Much of this is perhaps due to the fact that there are comparably few defenders of such. This has created a vacuum for critics to comfortably object to the existence of demons without sophistication (for it is only in the prof...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Guthrie, Shandon L. (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: MDPI 2022
Dans: Religions
Année: 2022, Volume: 13, Numéro: 7
Sujets non-standardisés:B Cognitive Science
B Demonology
B explanatory reasoning
B gaps-based objections
B Demons
B Devil
B Mental Disorders
B Metaphysics
B Angels
B Satan
Accès en ligne: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1811956513
003 DE-627
005 20220729055900.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220729s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3390/rel13070610  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1811956513 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1811956513 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1181966256  |0 (DE-627)166246925X  |4 aut  |a Guthrie, Shandon L. 
109 |a Guthrie, Shandon L. 
245 1 0 |a How Not to Object to Demonic Realism 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a There are few academics today who actively argue against demonic realism. Much of this is perhaps due to the fact that there are comparably few defenders of such. This has created a vacuum for critics to comfortably object to the existence of demons without sophistication (for it is only in the professional exchange of ideas do bad arguments get weeded out and good arguments gain vitality). Add to this the common perception of demonology as an anti-intellectual superstition and we end up with a threshold for the success of anti-realist arguments to be set quite low. In this paper, I shall survey three of the most familiar objections to demonic realism to arise out of this skeptical intellectual environment: First, and most ambitiously, there is the impossibility of justified belief objection that proffers that belief in demons cannot even in principle be justified no matter how much (scientific) evidence there is. Alternative explanations are always to be preferred. Second, there is the demon-of-the-gaps objection (or category of objections) which insists that demonic realism is hastily posited as a pre-scientific explanation for physical, medical, and psychological mysteries. Third, there is what I call the ethical argument from scapegoating that questions the existence of demons on grounds that, if they in fact exist, such a fact would preclude moral responsibility and the possibility of retributive justice since we could never know if a bad actor was himself morally culpable for his own evils or if he was under the coercive influence of demonic agents. I argue that, despite their rhetorical appeal and kinship with the anti-supernatural sentiments of many academics today, these three arguments are not successful, for these are either based on egregious philosophical assumptions or assumptions about demonology few if any adopt. 
650 4 |a explanatory reasoning 
650 4 |a Angels 
650 4 |a Devil 
650 4 |a Demons 
650 4 |a Cognitive Science 
650 4 |a Mental Disorders 
650 4 |a gaps-based objections 
650 4 |a Metaphysics 
650 4 |a Satan 
650 4 |a Demonology 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religions  |d Basel : MDPI, 2010  |g 13(2022), 7, Artikel-ID 610  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)665435797  |w (DE-600)2620962-7  |w (DE-576)348219067  |x 2077-1444  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:13  |g year:2022  |g number:7  |g elocationid:610 
856 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/7/610/pdf?version=1657071488  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13070610  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/7/610  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 13  |j 2022  |e 7  |i 610 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4173660073 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1811956513 
LOK |0 005 20220729052609 
LOK |0 008 220729||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-07-28#610E2669C9395276DC27DEB1A6793BD68503BA49 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL