Sex Differences: Evolved, Constructed, and Designed

Evolutionary psychology (EP) is reviewed as one currently popular theoretical framework to explain and predict psychological and behavioral differences between women and men. This approach has considerable promise, but there are numerous logical, theoretical, and methodological problems yet to be re...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Looy, Heather (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage Publishing 2001
In: Journal of psychology and theology
Year: 2001, Volume: 29, Issue: 4, Pages: 301-313
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1809022851
003 DE-627
005 20220704090310.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220704s2001 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/009164710102900403  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1809022851 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1809022851 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Looy, Heather  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Sex Differences: Evolved, Constructed, and Designed 
264 1 |c 2001 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Evolutionary psychology (EP) is reviewed as one currently popular theoretical framework to explain and predict psychological and behavioral differences between women and men. This approach has considerable promise, but there are numerous logical, theoretical, and methodological problems yet to be resolved. Social constructionism (SC) is briefly reviewed as an alternative approach that more adequately accounts for gender and sexual diversity; however it minimizes human embodiment. Both approaches deny a supernatural or spiritual dimension in creation; EP often explicitly assumes philosophical naturalism–a belief in a material universe in which evolutionary processes are random and purposeless. This assumption limits its ability to account for several aspects of the experience and the expression of human sexuality. The intelligent design (ID) approach is considered here as a possible complement to EP and SC. The key difference is foundational: ID assumes and infers the necessity of a supernatural, purposeful element. This assumption provides a broader interpretive framework and some potentially novel predictions about human sexuality. All three approaches have something to contribute to our understanding of human sexuality, and I conclude that a cautious, critical mutual engagement may enable us to transcend the dichotomies and limitations of each theoretical framework. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of psychology and theology  |d London : Sage Publishing, 1973  |g 29(2001), 4, Seite 301-313  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341346381  |w (DE-600)2067352-8  |w (DE-576)273869256  |x 2328-1162  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:29  |g year:2001  |g number:4  |g pages:301-313 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1641698861  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/009164710102900403  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 29  |j 2001  |e 4  |h 301-313 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4160913199 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1809022851 
LOK |0 005 20220704090310 
LOK |0 008 220704||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-06-22#A95EDA1A379B47C626F7E3943387A5D0CF39A581 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL