Breaking the Conservative Monopoly on Religious Liberty

In recent years, conservative legal advocates in the U.S. (and increasingly abroad) have engaged in large-scale—and often successful—efforts to gain religious exemptions from laws advancing reproductive and LGBTQ rights. But conservatives do not hold a monopoly on religion or religious liberty litig...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Reiner Platt, Elizabeth (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2022
In: The review of faith & international affairs
Year: 2022, Volume: 20, Issue: 2, Pages: 13-26
Further subjects:B Christian Right
B religious progressives
B free exercise clause
B Religious Liberty
B Religious Freedom
B religious left
B Religious Pluralism
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1805597612
003 DE-627
005 20220602052625.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220602s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/15570274.2022.2065807  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1805597612 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1805597612 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Reiner Platt, Elizabeth  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Breaking the Conservative Monopoly on Religious Liberty 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In recent years, conservative legal advocates in the U.S. (and increasingly abroad) have engaged in large-scale—and often successful—efforts to gain religious exemptions from laws advancing reproductive and LGBTQ rights. But conservatives do not hold a monopoly on religion or religious liberty litigation. Religious minorities, progressive Christians, and other faith practitioners have brought a diverse range of religious liberty claims. This article surveys ten such lawsuits and analyzes their key differences with claims brought by social conservatives. It argues that advocates of religious pluralism in America and abroad should devote more resources and attention to progressive religious liberty claims. 
650 4 |a free exercise clause 
650 4 |a religious left 
650 4 |a religious progressives 
650 4 |a Christian Right 
650 4 |a Religious Pluralism 
650 4 |a Religious Freedom 
650 4 |a Religious Liberty 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The review of faith & international affairs  |d Arlington, Va. : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2005  |g 20(2022), 2, Seite 13-26  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)662163788  |w (DE-600)2612695-3  |w (DE-576)346017173  |x 1931-7743  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:20  |g year:2022  |g number:2  |g pages:13-26 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2022.2065807  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 20  |j 2022  |e 2  |h 13-26 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4142226967 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1805597612 
LOK |0 005 20220602052625 
LOK |0 008 220602||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-06-01#23CECCDC02DBE85888A9024683A653B3EA479C1B 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL