Kelam Düşünce Tarihinde Yaygın Bir Hatanın Tashihi (İn'ikâs-ı Edille) ve Mütekaddimin Kelamı ile Mantık İlişkisi Üzerine Bir Eleştiri

Many scholars researching on the history of Islamic theology (Kalam) frequently reference to İn’ikas-ı edille (When there is no proof there is no object proved ) basing on the informations given by Ibn Khaldun. It is asserted that Muslim Theologians refute that proof after the critics of al-Ghazali....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Nebentitel:The Correction of a common wrong in the history of theological thought (in’ikas-i edille) and a critical analyses on the relation between logic and the the earlier muslim theologies
1. VerfasserIn: Demi̇r, Hilmi (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Türkisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: DergiPark Akademik 2007
In: Dinî araştırmalar
Jahr: 2007, Band: 10, Heft: 29, Seiten: 79-114
weitere Schlagwörter:B İn’ikâs-ı edille
B al-tard wa-al- ‘aks
B qiyas al-’aks
B Al-Ghazali
B Ibn Khaldun
B Kalam
B Logic
Online Zugang: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1801302448
003 DE-627
005 20220510143546.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220510s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||tur c
035 |a (DE-627)1801302448 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1801302448 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a tur 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Demi̇r, Hilmi  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Kelam Düşünce Tarihinde Yaygın Bir Hatanın Tashihi (İn'ikâs-ı Edille) ve Mütekaddimin Kelamı ile Mantık İlişkisi Üzerine Bir Eleştiri 
246 1 |i Übersetzung des Haupttitels  |a The Correction of a common wrong in the history of theological thought (in’ikas-i edille) and a critical analyses on the relation between logic and the the earlier muslim theologies 
264 1 |c 2007 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Many scholars researching on the history of Islamic theology (Kalam) frequently reference to İn’ikas-ı edille (When there is no proof there is no object proved ) basing on the informations given by Ibn Khaldun. It is asserted that Muslim Theologians refute that proof after the critics of al-Ghazali. It is commonly accepted that al-Ghazali gave preference to Aristotelian logic in the Islamic theology/Kalam. But in what context he did it so? An answer of this question is uncertain. In this article we will discuss this assertion attributing to the earlier muslim theologions based on Ibn Khaldun is true or not. In addition we will try to make establish the source of this assertion systematically and elaborately and why is it wrong being attributed of this source to the Ash’aries 
650 4 |a Ibn Khaldun 
650 4 |a Kalam 
650 4 |a Al-Ghazali 
650 4 |a al-tard wa-al- ‘aks 
650 4 |a Logic 
650 4 |a qiyas al-’aks 
650 4 |a İn’ikâs-ı edille 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Dinî araştırmalar  |d [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] : DergiPark Akademik, 1998  |g 10(2007), 29, Seite 79-114  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)1011059231  |w (DE-600)2916936-7  |w (DE-576)497270226  |x 2602-2435  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:10  |g year:2007  |g number:29  |g pages:79-114 
856 4 0 |u https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/da/issue/4466/61599  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 10  |j 2007  |e 29  |h 79-114 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4131446456 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1801302448 
LOK |0 005 20220510141535 
LOK |0 008 220510||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Kalām 
STB 0 0 |a Kalâm 
STC 0 0 |a Kalam 
STD 0 0 |a Kalām 
STE 0 0 |a 伊斯兰教义学,凯拉姆学,伊斯兰神学 
STF 0 0 |a 伊斯蘭教義學,凱拉姆學,伊斯蘭神學 
STG 0 0 |a Kalam 
STH 0 0 |a Калам 
STI 0 0 |a Kalām 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Kalām,Ilm al-Kalam,ʿIlm al-Kalām,Kelâm