Kelam Düşünce Tarihinde Yaygın Bir Hatanın Tashihi (İn'ikâs-ı Edille) ve Mütekaddimin Kelamı ile Mantık İlişkisi Üzerine Bir Eleştiri

Many scholars researching on the history of Islamic theology (Kalam) frequently reference to İn’ikas-ı edille (When there is no proof there is no object proved ) basing on the informations given by Ibn Khaldun. It is asserted that Muslim Theologians refute that proof after the critics of al-Ghazali....

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Subtitles:The Correction of a common wrong in the history of theological thought (in’ikas-i edille) and a critical analyses on the relation between logic and the the earlier muslim theologies
Main Author: Demi̇r, Hilmi (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:Turkish
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: DergiPark Akademik 2007
In: Dinî araştırmalar
Year: 2007, Volume: 10, Issue: 29, Pages: 79-114
Further subjects:B İn’ikâs-ı edille
B al-tard wa-al- ‘aks
B qiyas al-’aks
B Al-Ghazali
B Ibn Khaldun
B Kalām
B Logic
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:Many scholars researching on the history of Islamic theology (Kalam) frequently reference to İn’ikas-ı edille (When there is no proof there is no object proved ) basing on the informations given by Ibn Khaldun. It is asserted that Muslim Theologians refute that proof after the critics of al-Ghazali. It is commonly accepted that al-Ghazali gave preference to Aristotelian logic in the Islamic theology/Kalam. But in what context he did it so? An answer of this question is uncertain. In this article we will discuss this assertion attributing to the earlier muslim theologions based on Ibn Khaldun is true or not. In addition we will try to make establish the source of this assertion systematically and elaborately and why is it wrong being attributed of this source to the Ash’aries
ISSN:2602-2435
Contains:Enthalten in: Dinî araştırmalar