Uskonnontutkimus prosessina: Russell T. McCutcheonin kirjoitukset kiistelyn, nyökyttelyn ja neuvottelun kohteena

Russell T. McCutcheon has emphasized the role of theorizing in the study of religion. In his writings McCutcheon describes research process in which theory is the primary factor: it is placed before methods and data both in order and in significance. Although the importance of theorizing is generall...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kokkinen, Nina (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:Finnish
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Uskontotiede, Helsingin yliopisto 2006
In: Uskonnontutkija
Year: 2006, Issue: 2
Further subjects:B Nina Kokkinen
B uskontokritiikki
B Russell T. McCutcheon
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1799661032
003 DE-627
005 20220414154607.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220414s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||fin c
035 |a (DE-627)1799661032 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1799661032 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a fin 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Kokkinen, Nina  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Uskonnontutkimus prosessina  |b Russell T. McCutcheonin kirjoitukset kiistelyn, nyökyttelyn ja neuvottelun kohteena 
264 1 |c 2006 
300 |a 18 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Russell T. McCutcheon has emphasized the role of theorizing in the study of religion. In his writings McCutcheon describes research process in which theory is the primary factor: it is placed before methods and data both in order and in significance. Although the importance of theorizing is generally agreed upon, this article reconsiders how theories can be chosen before the researcher is more familiar with his or her data. Theories cannot become ready-made formulas or patterns that are followed blindly. When theory is understood to be an ad hoc tool, it can also be chosen in dialog with the data. A scholar of religion can utilize three methods in making decisions between different theories and revising chosen theories during the research process: he or she can (1) recycle (theoretically based) questions until the data seems to give proper answers, (2) pay attention to little details and (3) use radical contextualization in order to find more interesting questions and connections. McCutcheon’s dichotomy between naive humanists and critical scholars of religions is also questioned in this article. 
650 4 |a Nina Kokkinen 
650 4 |a Russell T. McCutcheon 
650 4 |a uskontokritiikki 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Uskonnontutkija  |d Helsinki : Uskontotiede, Helsingin yliopisto, 2006  |g (2006), 2  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)1751600564  |w (DE-600)3057451-1  |x 1796-4407  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g year:2006  |g number:2  |g extent:18 
856 4 0 |u https://journal.fi/uskonnontutkija/article/view/64957  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |j 2006  |e 2  |g 18 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4117921835 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1799661032 
LOK |0 005 20220414154218 
LOK |0 008 220414||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL