Outside Institutions?: A Quantitative Approach to Religious Individualization and Deinstitutionalization in Mexico and Argentina

The purpose of this article is to analyze religious individualism and deinstitutionalization in Mexico and Argentina based on a quantitative research strategy which enables a description and comparison of the two countries’ religious beliefs and practices as well as those of people who define themse...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Funes, María Eugenia (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Springer International Publishing 2021
In: International journal of Latin American religions
Jahr: 2021, Band: 5, Heft: 2, Seiten: 519-532
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen):B Mexiko / Argentinien / Religion / Entinstitutionalisierung / Individualisierung
RelBib Classification:AD Religionssoziologie; Religionspolitik
AG Religiöses Leben; materielle Religion
CB Christliche Existenz; Spiritualität
KBR Lateinamerika
RA Praktische Theologie
weitere Schlagwörter:B Argentina
B Mexico
B Religious individualization and deinstitutionalization
Online Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The purpose of this article is to analyze religious individualism and deinstitutionalization in Mexico and Argentina based on a quantitative research strategy which enables a description and comparison of the two countries’ religious beliefs and practices as well as those of people who define themselves as "relating to God in my own way" in Argentina; and "believer in my own way" and "spiritual without church" in Mexico. Drawing from recent social sciences debates about religion, which have questioned some extremely individual interpretations of religious life, it can be argued that even when people detach themselves from religious institutions in a discursive manner, many of their religious practices are developed collectively and are influenced by their sociabilities and national contexts. These findings intend to make a contribution to recent attempts to build a complex assessment of those two categories, most of which are based on qualitative research, by means of a quantitative approach.
ISSN:2509-9965
Enthält:Enthalten in: International journal of Latin American religions
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s41603-021-00142-6