Congregations of a Feather? Exploring Homophily in a Network of Religious Congregations

BackgroundHomophily, the tendency for relationships to be more common among actors who share similarities, has been observed in social network studies of individuals and organizations. Homophily can encourage close, supportive relationships but limit exposure to diversity. Homophily may have importa...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: McClure, Jennifer M. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer 2021
In: Review of religious research
Year: 2021, Volume: 63, Issue: 4, Pages: 559-582
Further subjects:B Rural
B Social Network
B Church of Christ
B Congregations
B Multiracial
B Homophily
B Religion
B LDS
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1797391976
003 DE-627
005 20220401160442.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220401s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s13644-021-00449-y  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1797391976 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1797391976 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1052215971  |0 (DE-627)788011693  |0 (DE-576)407971106  |4 aut  |a McClure, Jennifer M. 
109 |a McClure, Jennifer M.  |a MacClure, Jennifer M.  |a McClure, Jennifer 
245 1 0 |a Congregations of a Feather? Exploring Homophily in a Network of Religious Congregations 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a BackgroundHomophily, the tendency for relationships to be more common among actors who share similarities, has been observed in social network studies of individuals and organizations. Homophily can encourage close, supportive relationships but limit exposure to diversity. Homophily may have important implications for religious congregations, but research has been limited due to few social network data collections on congregations.PurposeThis research note uses a new data collection from an inter-congregational network of religious congregations in eight counties encompassing and surrounding a major metropolitan area in the southeastern United States. Its goal is to identify sources of homophily between congregations as well as types of congregations whose immediate networks, which include the congregations to which a congregation has direct relational ties, differ in levels of homophily.MethodsQuadratic assignment procedure correlations are used to identify sources of homophily, and both fractional logistic and negative binomial regression models are used to examine the extent to which congregational characteristics predict levels of homophily.ResultsThree key sources of homophily include sharing the same religious tradition and family, sharing the same racial composition, and having a smaller geographical distance between congregations. Congregations’ religious family, racial composition, community setting, and the extent to which attenders are younger and newer matter for predicting levels of homophily. The results have implications for: LDS and Church of Christ congregations; multiracial congregations; declining denominationalism; rural congregations.Conclusionsand ImplicationsCongregations of a feather do, in fact, flock together. The results inform a variety of practical implications for congregations. Because of the time constraints experienced by many ministers, denominational events might provide some of the most accessible opportunities to build relationships with other congregations. Multiracial congregations often serve as bridges connecting congregations of different racial compositions. Distinctive and centralized religious groups, like the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, may also effectively encourage relationships across congregations of different racial compositions. Homophily may also impact the extent to which congregations learn about innovations from other congregations and the extent to which collaborations with other congregations are effective. 
601 |a Network 
650 4 |a Church of Christ 
650 4 |a Congregations 
650 4 |a Homophily 
650 4 |a LDS 
650 4 |a Multiracial 
650 4 |a Religion 
650 4 |a Rural 
650 4 |a Social Network 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Review of religious research  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer, 1959  |g 63(2021), 4, Seite 559-582  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)362776326  |w (DE-600)2100833-4  |w (DE-576)257192638  |x 2211-4866  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:63  |g year:2021  |g number:4  |g pages:559-582 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-021-00449-y  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 63  |j 2021  |e 4  |h 559-582 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4109712386 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1797391976 
LOK |0 005 20220401154808 
LOK |0 008 220401||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Religion,Religions,Religion,Religion in literature 
STB 0 0 |a Religion,Religions,Religion 
STC 0 0 |a Religión,Religión,Religión 
STD 0 0 |a Religione,Religione,Religione 
STE 0 0 |a 宗教,宗教 
STF 0 0 |a 宗教,宗教 
STG 0 0 |a Religião,Religião 
STH 0 0 |a Религия (мотив),Религия 
STI 0 0 |a Θρησκεία (μοτίβο),Θρησκεία 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Religion,Mystik,Mythologie