Feministic Islamophobia: Representation of Muslim Women in V.S. Naipaul’s Travelogues and Daniel Pipes’ History
When feminism is co-opted to caricature Islam and Muslim men as patriarchal and oppressive to women, it may cause Islamophobia. This interrelation between feminism and Islamophobia can be called ‘Feministic Islamophobia'. Such Islamophobia is reflected in V. S. Naipaul's travelogues – “Amo...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Routledge, part of the Taylor & Francis Group
2021
|
| Dans: |
Journal of Muslim minority affairs
Année: 2021, Volume: 41, Numéro: 4, Pages: 669-684 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Daniel Pipes’ history
B V.S. Naipaul’s travelogues B representation of Muslim women B feministic Islamophobia |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | When feminism is co-opted to caricature Islam and Muslim men as patriarchal and oppressive to women, it may cause Islamophobia. This interrelation between feminism and Islamophobia can be called ‘Feministic Islamophobia'. Such Islamophobia is reflected in V. S. Naipaul's travelogues – “Among the Believers: An Islamic Journey” (1981) and “Beyond Belief: Islamic Excursions among the Converted Peoples” (1998). An advocate of these travelogues Daniel Pipes (1949- ) wrote an Islamic history – In the Path of God: Islam and Political Power (1983) – that, like Naipaulian travelogues, represents feministic Islamophobia. This article argues that the co-opted feminism of both Naipaul's travelogues and Pipes’ history causes feministic Islamophobia that is one of the causes of intertextual dynamic between their texts. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-9591 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of Muslim minority affairs
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/13602004.2022.2029013 |