Two Aramaic Contracts without Dates: New Collations (C 11, 49)
Forty-five Aramaic contracts or fragments from 5th-century B. C. Egypt testify to the presence of a date at the beginning of that century. Two of the contracts lack dates and endorsements (Cowley 11 and 49). Repeated examination of C 11 (Bodleian Library) has resulted in the relocation of ten fragme...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
The University of Chicago Press
1985
|
| Dans: |
Bulletin of ASOR
Année: 1985, Volume: 258, Pages: 41-52 |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Édition parallèle: | Non-électronique
|
| Résumé: | Forty-five Aramaic contracts or fragments from 5th-century B. C. Egypt testify to the presence of a date at the beginning of that century. Two of the contracts lack dates and endorsements (Cowley 11 and 49). Repeated examination of C 11 (Bodleian Library) has resulted in the relocation of ten fragments. Textually, this yields the name of the debtor ([Gema]rish ]b. A]ḥio; reduces the amount of the loan (3½ shekels) and interest (7 ḥallurs per month); and raises the date within the document (December 23, 487-January 21, 486 B. C.). Papyrologically, it demonstrates that the document lacked initial date and endorsement. R. Degen joined P. Berlin 23104 to C 49 to yield a 23-cm-wide text. However, the folding pattern requires a 29-cm width and demonstrates that the text lacked date and endorsement. Although the expression ytly ʿlyk remains difficult, the text was probably a receipt (nbz) or a cancellation of debt. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2161-8062 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: American Schools of Oriental Research, Bulletin of ASOR
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2307/1356897 |