The Human World as Augmented Reality: Transcendentalism and Anthropological Difference = Žmogaus pasaulis kaip tikrovės prieaugis : transcendentalizmas ir antropologinis skirtumas
[full article, abstract in English; abstract in Lithuanian]In this paper, I discuss, first of all, the positions of Perter Singer and Jacques Derrida regarding the difference between humans and animals. Singer’s animalism seems to me grounded in a naturalist substantialism (since it aims at dissolvi...
| Autres titres: | Žmogaus pasaulis kaip tikrovės prieaugis |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Vilniaus Universiteto Leidykla
2017
|
| Dans: |
Religija ir kultūra
Année: 2017, Volume: 20/21, Pages: 18-28 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Human
B antropologinis skirtumas B Animal B Augmented Reality B gyvūnas B anthropological difference B tikrovės prieaugis B žmogus |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Résumé: | [full article, abstract in English; abstract in Lithuanian]In this paper, I discuss, first of all, the positions of Perter Singer and Jacques Derrida regarding the difference between humans and animals. Singer’s animalism seems to me grounded in a naturalist substantialism (since it aims at dissolving the abovementioned difference in a common genus, animality), whereas Derrida’s approach ends in a phenomenological primitivism (since it aims at grasping the gaze of the animal through an epoché of the human cultural world). The result is, on the one hand, an essentialist reduction to the One, and, on the other, the nominalist multiplication of the Many. As an alternative to both these perspectives, I share a certain "transcendentalist" approach, in which human difference appears as a capacity to form a world in the Heideggerian meaning, which increases natural reality. The symbol of this new capacity is the upright position, a certain elevation above nature, the sign of which is consciousness. I call this new capacity "diagonal," since, like the diagonal of the square, it is irreducible to its side - to nature (the plane of immanence) -, as much as the human world of "augmented reality" is indeed irreducible to every flat ontology, that is, to an onticology. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1822-4539 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Religija ir kultūra
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.15388/Relig.2017.12 |