Paradoxes of Universalism: The Case of the Swiss Disability Insurance

Social policies rely on specific expectations vis-a-vis their beneficiaries, who have to abide by certain eligibility criteria or behavioral standards to access the benefits or services provided. As such, they draw boundaries between the deserving and undeserving, which results in the following para...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Rosenstein, Emilie (Author) ; Bonvin, Jean-Michel 1967- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cogitatio Press 2020
In: Social Inclusion
Year: 2020, Volume: 8, Issue: 1, Pages: 168-177
Further subjects:B selectivity
B Capability
B Universalism
B disability policies
B activation
B social policies
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1788707893
003 DE-627
005 20220207171338.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220207s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.17645/si.v8i1.2499  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1788707893 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1788707893 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1212523180  |0 (DE-627)1702029794  |4 aut  |a Rosenstein, Emilie 
109 |a Rosenstein, Emilie 
245 1 0 |a Paradoxes of Universalism  |b The Case of the Swiss Disability Insurance 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Social policies rely on specific expectations vis-a-vis their beneficiaries, who have to abide by certain eligibility criteria or behavioral standards to access the benefits or services provided. As such, they draw boundaries between the deserving and undeserving, which results in the following paradox: While social policies claim to be universal, they actually exclude potential beneficiaries by imposing on them the compliance with these eligibility criteria and behavioral standards. In other words, purportedly universal social policies may have exclusionary effects, in the form either of selectivity (street-level bureaucrats select what they perceive as legitimate beneficiaries) or of self-exclusion and non-take-up (people entitled do not claim benefits or services). Based on the case of the Swiss disability insurance, this article explores the extent of, and the reasons underlying, the paradoxes of universalism within active social policies. It relies on a mixed-methods research design, combining sequence analysis (showing the selectivity of active reforms regarding people’s access to disability benefits) and in-depth interviews. The conclusion of this article suggests that not all forms of universalism are equally exposed to such paradoxes and proposes a hypothesis to be explored in further research: The more requiring and precise in terms of eligibility criteria and behavioral standards social policies and activation strategies are (hard universalism), the higher the risk that they lead to selective practices in contradiction with their universal ambition. By contrast, fuzzier eligibility or behavioral criteria (soft universalism), which allow for adjustment to individual circumstances, may lead to more genuinely universal and inclusive social policies. 
650 4 |a activation 
650 4 |a Capability 
650 4 |a disability policies 
650 4 |a selectivity 
650 4 |a social policies 
650 4 |a Universalism 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1138812765  |0 (DE-627)896405389  |0 (DE-576)492716269  |4 aut  |a Bonvin, Jean-Michel  |d 1967- 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Social Inclusion  |d Lisbon : Cogitatio Press, 2013  |g 8(2020), 1, Seite 168-177  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)791558738  |w (DE-600)2779362-X  |w (DE-576)410285277  |x 2183-2803  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:8  |g year:2020  |g number:1  |g pages:168-177 
856 |u https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/download/2499/2499  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i1.2499  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/2499  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 8  |j 2020  |e 1  |h 168-177 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4052229290 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1788707893 
LOK |0 005 20220207164606 
LOK |0 008 220207||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL