Restructuring Deliberation Using a Cultural Theory Lens

Designing broad public deliberation is challenging. In addition, participants of public deliberation are guided by their cultural norms, values, and rules. This creates a tension between the goal of practical approaches to broad public deliberation and how individuals perceive issues and relate to o...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Williams, Teshanee (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Wiley 2021
Dans: The Hastings Center report
Année: 2021, Volume: 51, Pages: 62-65
Sujets non-standardisés:B Worldviews
B Public engagement
B Bioethics
B democratic deliberation
B emerging biotechnologies
B Cultural Theory
B gene editing
B public deliberation
Accès en ligne: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Résumé:Designing broad public deliberation is challenging. In addition, participants of public deliberation are guided by their cultural norms, values, and rules. This creates a tension between the goal of practical approaches to broad public deliberation and how individuals perceive issues and relate to others in the world. Despite such challenges, we must continue to create opportunities for the public to deliberate about and provide input into the regulation of emerging technologies. Therefore, previously imagined approaches to broad public deliberation should be reevaluated to better utilize the information gained during the process and expand the range of ideas incorporated into decision-making. To do this, institutions must consider how the public makes sense of complex issues concerning cultural conflict. This article introduces a framework that demonstrates how cultural theory can be used for rethinking previous approaches to public deliberation. In doing so, it offers guidelines for designing public deliberation involving distinct public participation venues based on different worldviews.
ISSN:1552-146X
Contient:Enthalten in: Hastings Center, The Hastings Center report
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1002/hast.1321