Deficits of Public Deliberation in U.S. Oversight for Gene Edited Organisms
Environmental releases of gene edited (GEdOs) and gene drive organisms (GDOs) will likely occur under conditions of high uncertainty and in complex socioecological systems. Therefore, public deliberation is especially important to account for diverse interpretations of safety, risks, and benefits; t...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley
2021
|
In: |
The Hastings Center report
Year: 2021, Volume: 51, Pages: 25-33 |
Further subjects: | B
Deliberation
B Bioethics B Genome editing B Regulation B democratic deliberation B Commitment B gene editing B Responsible innovation |
Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1787217159 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220126142241.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220126s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1002/hast.1317 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1787217159 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1787217159 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Kuzma, Jennifer |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Deficits of Public Deliberation in U.S. Oversight for Gene Edited Organisms |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Environmental releases of gene edited (GEdOs) and gene drive organisms (GDOs) will likely occur under conditions of high uncertainty and in complex socioecological systems. Therefore, public deliberation is especially important to account for diverse interpretations of safety, risks, and benefits; to draw on experiential and public wisdom in areas of proposed release; to ameliorate dangers of technological optimism; and to increase the public legitimacy of decisions. Yet there is a "democratic deficit" in the United States' oversight system for GEdOs and GDOs, as unconflicted experts, publics, and skeptical stakeholders are most often excluded from decision-making and unavailable to critically examine potential risks and benefits or raise broader concerns about socioeconomic or cultural impacts. This article argues for the need to open up decision-making for GEdOs and GDOs, discusses the challenges for doing so within the current oversight framework, and finally, proposes institutional, policy, and attitudinal changes that are likely important for overcoming barriers to public deliberation. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Bioethics | |
650 | 4 | |a Deliberation | |
650 | 4 | |a democratic deliberation | |
650 | 4 | |a Engagement | |
650 | 4 | |a gene editing | |
650 | 4 | |a Genome Editing | |
650 | 4 | |a Regulation | |
650 | 4 | |a Responsible innovation | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |a Hastings Center |t The Hastings Center report |d Malden, Mass. : Wiley, 1971 |g 51(2021,S2), S. S25-S33 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341346551 |w (DE-600)2067369-3 |w (DE-576)258761822 |x 1552-146X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:51 |g year:2021 |g supplement:S2 |g pages:25-33 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1317 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/hast.1317 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
936 | u | w | |d 51 |j 2021 |f S2 |h 25-33 |y 51(2021,S2), S. S25-S33 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 404482889X | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1787217159 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220126134701 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220126||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Commitment,Commitment (Psychology),Genome editing,Regulation |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Engagement,Engagement (psychologie),Régulation,Édition génomique |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Edición de genoma,Empeño,Regularización |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Genome editing,Correzione del DNA,Correzione del DNA,Impegno,Regolazione |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 参与,插手,热心参与 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 參與,插手,熱心參與,基因组编辑 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Edição de genoma,Engajamento,Regularização |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Активность,Инициативность,Регуляция,Редактирование генома |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Δέσμευση,Ρύθμιση,Τροποποίηση γονιδιώματος |
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Innere Beteiligung , Genomchirurgie,Genom-Editierung,Gene Editing |