Waging Peace amid Raging War: A Concise Critical Assessment of Interreligious Dialogue as a Tool for Peacemaking

The unfortunate complicity of religion in conflict and war is well documented. Less well documented, however, are the times and ways religion contributes to making peace. This article adds to the latter body of literature by addressing the link between peacemaking and interreligious dialogue. To tha...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:The ecumenical review
Auteur principal: Wilson, Nathan Day (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Wiley-Blackwell 2021
Dans: The ecumenical review
RelBib Classification:AX Dialogue interreligieux
BJ Islam
CC Christianisme et religions non-chrétiennes; relations interreligieuses
NCD Éthique et politique
ZC Politique en général
Sujets non-standardisés:B intrastate violence
B Public Religion
B Interreligious Dialogue
B Conflict Resolution
B religious peacemaking principles
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:The unfortunate complicity of religion in conflict and war is well documented. Less well documented, however, are the times and ways religion contributes to making peace. This article adds to the latter body of literature by addressing the link between peacemaking and interreligious dialogue. To that end, it identifies key principles in Islam and Christianity that direct peacemaking efforts. It then compares these principles, identifies key lessons, and suggests directions for future exploration of the potential for interreligious dialogue specifically for peacemaking efforts. It argues that the exploration of interreligious dialogue for peacemaking is becoming more critical as the nature of conflict becomes more intrastate and value differences increasingly drive violence.
ISSN:1758-6623
Contient:Enthalten in: The ecumenical review
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/erev.12666