Askesis and the logic of the spiral

This essay sets out to demonstrate a strong connection between eros and askesis in Foucault’s writings. Analogous to Huffer’s argument about eros, I suggest that askesis does not invoke a return to an imagined Greek past, but operates generatively to destabilize subjectivity and normativity. Askesis...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hamner, M. Gail (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group 2016
In: Theology & sexuality
Year: 2016, Volume: 22, Issue: 3, Pages: 143-154
Further subjects:B Askesis
B Huffer
B Liberation
B Foucault
B Forme
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1779666349
003 DE-627
005 20211127042819.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211127s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/13558358.2017.1329883  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1779666349 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1779666349 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Hamner, M. Gail  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Askesis and the logic of the spiral 
264 1 |c 2016 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This essay sets out to demonstrate a strong connection between eros and askesis in Foucault’s writings. Analogous to Huffer’s argument about eros, I suggest that askesis does not invoke a return to an imagined Greek past, but operates generatively to destabilize subjectivity and normativity. Askesis is central to Foucault’s methodology and, indeed, askesis and eros, two terms that Huffer depicts as “strange” and “untranslatable,” are both requisite for the projects of political, social, and personal liberation toward which Foucault labored. 
650 4 |a Liberation 
650 4 |a Form 
650 4 |a Askesis 
650 4 |a Huffer 
650 4 |a Foucault 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Theology & sexuality  |d London : Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, 1994  |g 22(2016), 3, Seite 143-154  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341908509  |w (DE-600)2070617-0  |w (DE-576)263021289  |x 1745-5170  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:22  |g year:2016  |g number:3  |g pages:143-154 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)1639652698  |k Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/13558358.2017.1329883  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 22  |j 2016  |e 3  |h 143-154 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4008481885 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1779666349 
LOK |0 005 20211127042819 
LOK |0 008 211127||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-11-23#DC0C3FAB0BE2C0D8CB761F4EE30002F97B306CBA 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Forme,Form,Form 
STB 0 0 |a Forme,Forme,Forme 
STC 0 0 |a Forma,Forma,Forma 
STD 0 0 |a Forma,Forma,Forma 
STE 0 0 |a 形式,形状,形态 
STF 0 0 |a 形式,形狀,形態 
STG 0 0 |a Forma,Forma,Forma 
STH 0 0 |a Форма (логика),Форма (философия),Форма 
STI 0 0 |a Μορφή (λογική),Μορφή (φιλοσοφία),Μορφή 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Logische Form