The Concept of Territories and Borders in Hittites’ Royal Ideology
The purpose of this paper is to present which components of the kingdom the Hittite kings recognized as their own lands. In the analysis, the usages of the Hittite verb maniyaḫḫ- ‘to govern’ and the noun irha-/arḫa- ‘border’ are examined to understand the Hittite concept of territories and borders....
| Veröffentlicht in: | Orient |
|---|---|
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Soc.
2020
|
| In: |
Orient
Jahr: 2020, Band: 55, Seiten: 29-41 |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Anatolia
B Royal Ideology B Borders B Territories B Hittite |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Zusammenfassung: | The purpose of this paper is to present which components of the kingdom the Hittite kings recognized as their own lands. In the analysis, the usages of the Hittite verb maniyaḫḫ- ‘to govern’ and the noun irha-/arḫa- ‘border’ are examined to understand the Hittite concept of territories and borders. Their usages show that, in the Hittite ideology, the state gods were regarded as heavenly owners of the Hittite lands, and the kings were given rule over these lands as divine deputies on earth. Those lands were centered in the Anatolian heartland, but they also extended to Carchemiš in Northern Syria. The Hittites, however, believed that they were not supposed to expand their territories unlimitedly, but rather protect them, since national borders were regarded as equal to the body of the state gods. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1884-1392 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Orient
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5356/orient.55.29 |