Case Comment: Do Indigenous Peoples Have a Right to Limit Religious Proselytism Activities in Their Territories?: A Response from the Case Law of the Colombian Constitutional Court
Abstract In ruling T-1022/01, the Colombian Constitutional Court responded to a claim brought by a member of the United Pentecostal Church of Colombia against the Yanacona Indigenous Council. The claimants alleged the violation of their rights to freedom of conscience, worship, and dissemination of...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill
2021
|
| Dans: |
Journal of law, religion and state
Année: 2021, Volume: 9, Numéro: 2/3, Pages: 299-307 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Kolumbien, Corte Constitucional
/ Jurisprudence
/ Peuple indigène
/ Identité culturelle
/ Liberté religieuse
/ Mission
/ Interdiction
|
| RelBib Classification: | BB Religions traditionnelles ou tribales CH Christianisme et société KBR Amérique Latine KDG Église libre XA Droit |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Indigenous Peoples
B religious proselytism B Religious Freedom B Colombian Constitutional Court B Cultural Identity |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | Abstract In ruling T-1022/01, the Colombian Constitutional Court responded to a claim brought by a member of the United Pentecostal Church of Colombia against the Yanacona Indigenous Council. The claimants alleged the violation of their rights to freedom of conscience, worship, and dissemination of thought based on two facts: (a) the refusal of their petition to carry out a “Spiritual Renewal Day” in the main square of the indigenous reservation of Caquiona, and (b) the interruption of the religious gatherings of the United Pentecostal Church of Colombia, as well as the prohibition of their pastors entering the indigenous reservation territory. The Court found no violation of the rights alleged. The purpose of this comment is to explore the understanding by the Colombian Constitutional Court of the right to cultural identity of indigenous communities, focusing particularly on whether it encompasses the right to be free from religious proselytism. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2212-4810 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of law, religion and state
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/22124810-2021J002 |