Human Rights, Islam, and debates around CEDAW
Abstract The article explores the tensions between FORB claims and the advancement of women’s rights in Muslim majority state contexts. Forms of Muslim majority state reservations to CEDAW are analysed in critical and comparative fashion. Iran’s historical engagement with CEDAW is studied for insigh...
| Auteurs: | ; |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill, Nijhoff
2021
|
| Dans: |
Religion and human rights
Année: 2021, Volume: 16, Numéro: 2/3, Pages: 93-116 |
| RelBib Classification: | AD Sociologie des religions BJ Islam XA Droit |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Iran
B CEDAW B freedom of religion or believe B religion-based reservations |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | Abstract The article explores the tensions between FORB claims and the advancement of women’s rights in Muslim majority state contexts. Forms of Muslim majority state reservations to CEDAW are analysed in critical and comparative fashion. Iran’s historical engagement with CEDAW is studied for insight into how a purported theoretical conflict between CEDAW and FORB may be better understood in terms of the domestic and international politics of gender and power. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1871-0328 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Religion and human rights
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/18710328-bja10020 |