From Murphy's Christian Physicalism to Lowe's Dualism

Nancey Murphy argues that God created us as physical beings without immortal souls. She supports this Christian physicalism by arguing that neuroscience can better explain minds in terms of physical information processing than dualists can in problematic nonphysical terms. We reply that Murphy overe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
VerfasserInnen: Jones, Mostyn (VerfasserIn) ; LaRock, Eric (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Presses Universitaires de Louvain, Université Catholique de Louvain 2021
In: TheoLogica
Jahr: 2021, Band: 5, Heft: 2, Seiten: 100-128
RelBib Classification:CF Christentum und Wissenschaft
KAJ Kirchengeschichte 1914-; neueste Zeit
NBE Anthropologie
VA Philosophie
weitere Schlagwörter:B E. J. Lowe
B Christian Physicalism
B Non-Cartesian substance dualism
Online Zugang: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Nancey Murphy argues that God created us as physical beings without immortal souls. She supports this Christian physicalism by arguing that neuroscience can better explain minds in terms of physical information processing than dualists can in problematic nonphysical terms. We reply that Murphy overestimates neuroscience and underestimates dualism. She doesn't show how neuroscience can explain the mind's characteristic qualia, unity, privacy, or causality. We argue that Lowe’s dualism can better explain minds, often with experimental support and in testable ways. Murphy's physicalism thus serves to highlight the value of Lowe's dualism today.
ISSN:2593-0265
Enthält:Enthalten in: TheoLogica
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.14428/thl.v5i2.56273