The spatial imaginaries of Mujaddidī Sufis and political integration in the northwestern borderlands of colonial India

This article identifies two comparable teaching and learning lines of the reformist Naqshbandiyya-Mujaddidīyya Sufi order in the Indo-Afghan borderlands in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. It describes the strategies of social engagement of the mobile mullās of the Akhund Ghaffūr-Haddā...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Haroon, Sana (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Carfax Publ. 2021
Dans: Journal of contemporary religion
Année: 2021, Volume: 36, Numéro: 2, Pages: 243-263
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Britisch-Indien / Nordwesten / Zone frontière / Naqshbandiya-Mujaddidiyya / Politique religieuse / Activité politique
RelBib Classification:AF Géographie religieuse
AG Vie religieuse
BJ Islam
KBM Asie
TJ Époque moderne
Sujets non-standardisés:B Afghanistan
B Pakistan
B Islam
B Anti-colonialism
B spatial history
B Frontier
B Sufism
B Reformism
B India
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:This article identifies two comparable teaching and learning lines of the reformist Naqshbandiyya-Mujaddidīyya Sufi order in the Indo-Afghan borderlands in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. It describes the strategies of social engagement of the mobile mullās of the Akhund Ghaffūr-Haddā Mullā line and those of the pīrs of the khānqah (Sufi lodge)-centered line of Khwājāh Usmān Dāmanī. The concurrent establishment of these two Sufi lines in the northwestern borderlands of colonial India was an important historical phenomenon inspired by a ‘reformed’ Mujaddidī practice and the two Sufi lines were comparable because of their roots in Mujaddidī reformism. I argue, however, that the two Sufi lines must also be differentiated because of the loci of their participation in and mediation of the day-to-day affairs of practising communities. Members of the Haddā Mullā’s line dispersed among the Pashtun borderland communities to enforce religious priorities from day to day, while members of Usmān Dāmanī’s line consciously confined their activities to the khānqah. The patterns of activity of the members of the two Mujaddidī lines suggest a new framework for understanding the relationship between Islam and politics in the Indo-Afghan borderlands: it was not the ideological approach to Islam, but the spatial imaginaries employed by the frontier Sufis which produced their respective political agendas and impact.
ISSN:1469-9419
Contient:Enthalten in: Journal of contemporary religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/13537903.2021.1943901