Modernity in Religion: A Response to Constantin Fasolt's “History and Religion in the Modern Age”

Contrary to Constantin Fasolt, I argue that it is no longer useful to think of religion as an anomaly in the modern age. Here is Fasolt's main argument: humankind suffers from a radical rift between the self and the world. The chief function of religion is to mitigate or cope with this fracture...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cladis, Mark Sydney 1958- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley 2006
In: History and theory
Year: 2006, Volume: 45, Issue: 4, Pages: 93-103
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1774492547
003 DE-627
005 20211019144600.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211019s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.1468-2303.2006.00386.x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1774492547 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1774492547 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1053069804  |0 (DE-627)789576783  |0 (DE-576)408795298  |4 aut  |a Cladis, Mark Sydney  |d 1958- 
109 |a Cladis, Mark Sydney 1958-  |a Cladis, Mark S. 1958- 
245 1 0 |a Modernity in Religion  |b A Response to Constantin Fasolt's “History and Religion in the Modern Age” 
264 1 |c 2006 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Contrary to Constantin Fasolt, I argue that it is no longer useful to think of religion as an anomaly in the modern age. Here is Fasolt's main argument: humankind suffers from a radical rift between the self and the world. The chief function of religion is to mitigate or cope with this fracture by means of dogmas and rituals that reconcile the self to the world. In the past, religion successfully fulfilled this job. But in modernity, it fails to, and it fails because religion is no longer plausible. Historical, confessional religions, then, are no longer doing what they are supposed to do; yet the need for religion is still very much with us. Fasolt's account would be a tragic tale, if not for his claim that there is a new religion for the modern age, a religion that fulfills the true reconciling function of religion. That new religion is the reading and writing of history. Indeed, for Fasolt, reading history is religiously redemptive, and writing history is a sacred act. The historian, it turns out, is the priest in modernity. In my response, I challenge both Fasolt's remedy (history as religiously redemptive) and its justification (the fall of historical religions). Indeed, I reject both his romantic view of past religion as the peaceful reconciler, as well as his pessimistic view of present religion as the maker of “enemies” among modern people. In the end, I argue that the way Fasolt employs his categories—“alienation,”“salvation,”“religion,”“history”— is too vague to do much useful work. They are significant categories and they deserve our attention. But in my view, the story Fasolt tells is both too grim (on human alienation) and too cheerful (on historian as modern savior). 
601 |a Religion 
601 |a Constantine 
601 |a Historie 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t History and theory  |d Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1960  |g 45(2006), 4, Seite 93-103  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271597585  |w (DE-600)1480747-6  |w (DE-576)07870815X  |x 1468-2303  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:45  |g year:2006  |g number:4  |g pages:93-103 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2006.00386.x  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2006.00386.x  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 45  |j 2006  |e 4  |h 93-103 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3991425572 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1774492547 
LOK |0 005 20211019144600 
LOK |0 008 211019||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL