A Complex Simplicity: The Relationship of Religiosity and Nonreligiosity to Life Satisfaction

Most previous research purportedly indicates a stable linear relationship between (non)religiosity and life satisfaction, but a review of these studies reveals a less consistent relationship and several conceptual and methodological issues. More recent research adds to the relationship's comple...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Pöhls, Katharina (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Wiley-Blackwell 2021
Dans: Journal for the scientific study of religion
Année: 2021, Volume: 60, Numéro: 3, Pages: 465-481
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Religiosity / Irreligiosity / Contentment / Wellness
RelBib Classification:AA Sciences des religions
AG Vie religieuse
CB Spiritualité chrétienne
ZA Sciences sociales
Sujets non-standardisés:B Subjective well-being
B belief certainty
B Atheism
B nonreligiosity
B Life Satisfaction
B Religiosity
B Social norms
Accès en ligne: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Résumé:Most previous research purportedly indicates a stable linear relationship between (non)religiosity and life satisfaction, but a review of these studies reveals a less consistent relationship and several conceptual and methodological issues. More recent research adds to the relationship's complexity by indicating that certain government regulations, social norms of religiosity, and a country's level of societal development interact with the relationship between individual (non)religiosity and life satisfaction. At the individual level, nonbelief certainty, nonreligious identity, belief in science, secular sources of meaning in life, and nonreligious group memberships appear to be central to nonreligious individuals’ life satisfaction. These findings emphasize the need for considering interactions with context factors, for differentiating between (non)religious subgroups, for multidimensional conceptualizations of nonreligiosity beyond the mere absence of religiosity, and for testing for nonlinear relationships. When these aspects are included in empirical research, differences in the level of life satisfaction between religious and nonreligious individuals largely disappear.
ISSN:1468-5906
Contient:Enthalten in: Journal for the scientific study of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/jssr.12723