Is expressivism theologically acceptable?
As a matter of fact, few, if any, theists have been expressivists about morality. This is probably because expressivism is thought to have unacceptable theological implications. That is, it is thought to imply (1) that God’s goodness depends on our desire-like states, (2) that God’s goodness is not...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2021
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2021, Volume: 90, Issue: 2, Pages: 121-131 |
| Further subjects: | B
Theism
B Explanation B Mind-dependence B Expressivism B Properties B Truth |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 177091692X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210918042641.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210918s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-021-09793-z |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)177091692X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP177091692X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Lambert, St.John |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Lambert, St.John |a Lambert, St. John |a Lambert, St John |a Lambert, StJohn | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Is expressivism theologically acceptable? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a As a matter of fact, few, if any, theists have been expressivists about morality. This is probably because expressivism is thought to have unacceptable theological implications. That is, it is thought to imply (1) that God’s goodness depends on our desire-like states, (2) that God’s goodness is not a real property, (3) that it is not true that God is good, and (4) that God’s moral thoughts have no explanation. I argue that expressivism has no such implications and conclude that expressivism is theologically acceptable. | ||
| 601 | |a Theologe | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Explanation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Truth | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Properties | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Mind-dependence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Theism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Expressivism | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1970 |g 90(2021), 2, Seite 121-131 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:90 |g year:2021 |g number:2 |g pages:121-131 |
| 856 | |u https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11153-021-09793-z.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-021-09793-z |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 90 |j 2021 |e 2 |h 121-131 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3979198227 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 177091692X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210918042641 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 210918||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-09-17#127F9509834A121D2AA2A59956706D2FA3F21489 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||