On Defining Israel: Or, Let's do the Kulturkreislehre Again!
Most study of the definition of early Israel, from an archaeological perspective, is based on outdated views on the relationship between material culture and group identity, ignoring recent social theory on the relationship between the archaeological finds and group identity. This has led to simplis...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Mohr Siebeck
2021
|
| Dans: |
Hebrew bible and ancient Israel
Année: 2021, Volume: 10, Numéro: 2, Pages: 106-148 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Âge du fer
/ Ethnicité
/ Identité
/ Israël (Motif)
/ Technologie
|
| RelBib Classification: | HH Archéologie KAB Christianisme primitif TC Époque pré-chrétienne |
| Accès en ligne: |
Accès probablement gratuit Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | Most study of the definition of early Israel, from an archaeological perspective, is based on outdated views on the relationship between material culture and group identity, ignoring recent social theory on the relationship between the archaeological finds and group identity. This has led to simplistic assumptions on defining and identifying the materials correlates - and the group identities - relevant for understanding the formation and development of early Israel. While critical of much of the research, and aware of the limitations of the ability to interpret the archaeological remains, I suggest some paths how to move forward in defining - what is and what is not - early Israel, stressing the need to focus on a bottom-up approach, commencing with the study of small-scale communities of practice. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2192-2284 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Hebrew bible and ancient Israel
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1628/hebai-2021-0010 |