1. Chasing India in Mexico City

A paradox informs the writing of Mexican and Indian history. In Malintzin's Choices: An Indian Woman in the Conquest of Mexico (2006), Camilla Townsend writes that Mexico was conquered and could never be conquered because indigenous ways of being in the world survived, adapted, and continued. S...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zaman, Taymiya R. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley 2021
In: History and theory
Year: 2021, Volume: 60, Issue: 3, Pages: 534-540
Further subjects:B Malintzin
B Mughal
B Memory
B Colonialism
B precolonial Mexico
B Change
B Mexico City
B South Asia
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1769441034
003 DE-627
005 20211004101757.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210906s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/hith.12227  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1769441034 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1769441034 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Zaman, Taymiya R.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a 1. Chasing India in Mexico City 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a A paradox informs the writing of Mexican and Indian history. In Malintzin's Choices: An Indian Woman in the Conquest of Mexico (2006), Camilla Townsend writes that Mexico was conquered and could never be conquered because indigenous ways of being in the world survived, adapted, and continued. Similarly, in A Book of Conquest: The Chachnama and Muslim Origins in South Asia (2016), Manan Ahmed Asif writes that Sindh was conquered by British armies but cities such as Uch, in which shrines and trees remain imbued with the sacred, point to that which is impossible to conquer. If change itself has unchanging essence embedded within it (we must know what Sindh or Mexico are in order to recognize that they have changed), then what would it mean for postcolonized historians to think more deeply about what historical narrative cannot conquer, tame, or control? How might we think about ways of doing history that we have internalized despite these being products of European conquest themselves? To reflect on these questions, I draw on my forays into Mexican history as a Mughal historian and discuss how examining premodern and modern encounters between the Muslim world and the Americas might open windows into unexplored ways of inhabiting the past and present. 
650 4 |a Mughal 
650 4 |a Mexico City 
650 4 |a Malintzin 
650 4 |a Change 
650 4 |a Memory 
650 4 |a Colonialism 
650 4 |a South Asia 
650 4 |a precolonial Mexico 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t History and theory  |d Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1960  |g 60(2021), 3, Seite 534-540  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271597585  |w (DE-600)1480747-6  |w (DE-576)07870815X  |x 1468-2303  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:60  |g year:2021  |g number:3  |g pages:534-540 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.12227  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/hith.12227  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 60  |j 2021  |e 3  |h 534-540 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3974174575 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1769441034 
LOK |0 005 20231013153905 
LOK |0 008 210906||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-09-05#42115D9177B4B170D7F2A550AC99EF6BBD4A1A3D 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL