Giving birth to the impossible: theology and deconstruction in Johannes Climacus’s Philosophical Fragments

According to Roger Poole, theological interpreters of Søren Kierkegaard’s indirect communication privilege content over form, whereas deconstructive interpreters privilege form over content. Here, I offer a reading of Johannes Climacus’s Philosophical Fragments to illustrate how, in this case, the t...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Middleton, Timothy A. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Taylor & Francis 2021
In: International journal of philosophy and theology
Year: 2021, Volume: 82, Issue: 2, Pages: 116-135
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Kierkegaard, Søren 1813-1855, Philosophiske smuler / Deconstruction / Incarnation
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history
NBF Christology
Further subjects:B Deconstruction
B Philosophical Fragments
B Kierkegaard
B Climacus
B Derrida
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1768379084
003 DE-627
005 20220428121957.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210902s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/21692327.2021.1923557  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1768379084 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1768379084 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1256381179  |0 (DE-627)1800493398  |4 aut  |a Middleton, Timothy A. 
109 |a Middleton, Timothy A.  |a Middleton, Timothy 
245 1 0 |a Giving birth to the impossible: theology and deconstruction in Johannes Climacus’s Philosophical Fragments 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a According to Roger Poole, theological interpreters of Søren Kierkegaard’s indirect communication privilege content over form, whereas deconstructive interpreters privilege form over content. Here, I offer a reading of Johannes Climacus’s Philosophical Fragments to illustrate how, in this case, the theology/deconstruction and form/content binaries both break down. The form of Fragments is as theological as it is deconstructive: Climacus’s kaleidoscopic quotation of scripture, and his parabolic tropes both attest to this. Similarly, the content of Fragments is as deconstructive as it is theological: the deferral of names, the madness of the moment of decision, and Climacus’s use of contradiction all unsettle any naïve theology. Ultimately, I suggest, the reason that Fragments resists the form/content and theology/deconstruction binaries is because it is a text about the incarnation – a paradigmatic combination of form and content, and a paradoxical reality that bursts apart any division between theology and deconstruction. 
601 |a Theologe 
601 |a Philosophie 
601 |a Fragment 
650 4 |a Deconstruction 
650 4 |a Derrida 
650 4 |a Philosophical Fragments 
650 4 |a Climacus 
650 4 |a Kierkegaard 
652 |a AB:KAH:NBF 
689 0 0 |d u  |0 (DE-588)4218636-5  |0 (DE-627)105032034  |0 (DE-576)210249676  |a Kierkegaard, Søren  |2 gnd  |d 1813-1855  |t Philosophiske smuler 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4149032-0  |0 (DE-627)105564281  |0 (DE-576)209769416  |2 gnd  |a Dekonstruktion 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4027024-5  |0 (DE-627)106286331  |0 (DE-576)208968881  |2 gnd  |a Inkarnation 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal of philosophy and theology  |d Abingdon [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 2013  |g 82(2021), 2, Seite 116-135  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)731333985  |w (DE-600)2692945-4  |w (DE-576)381266621  |x 2169-2335  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:82  |g year:2021  |g number:2  |g pages:116-135 
856 |u https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/21692327.2021.1923557?needAccess=true  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/21692327.2021.1923557  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 82  |j 2021  |e 2  |h 116-135 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3972444281 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1768379084 
LOK |0 005 20220304091533 
LOK |0 008 210902||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-09-01#DF7240628DEA6BC65BAADF155CCBE5AB8ACB55E0 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442051787  |a NBF 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044624  |a KAH 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Deconstruction,Incarnation,Incarnation,Avatāra,Avatars (Religion),Incarnation in art 
STB 0 0 |a Déconstruction,Incarnation,Incarnation (christianisme),Avatars (religion) 
STC 0 0 |a Deconstrucción,Encarnación,Encarnación,Encarnación 
STD 0 0 |a Decostruzione,Incarnazione,Incarnazione 
STE 0 0 |a 解构主义,解构理论,后结构主义,道成肉身,道成肉身,化身,化身 
STF 0 0 |a 解構主義,解構理論,後結構主義,道成肉身,道成肉身,化身,化身 
STG 0 0 |a Desconstrução,Encarnação,Encarnação 
STH 0 0 |a Воплощение (мотив),Воплощение (религия),Деконструкция 
STI 0 0 |a Αποδόμηση,Ενσάρκωση (μοτίβο),Ενσάρκωση 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a Kierkegaard, Søren,1813-1855,Philosophiske smuler eller En smule philosophie,Kierkegaard, Søren,1813-1855,Philosophische Bissen,Kierkegaard, Søren,1813-1855,Philosophische Brocken,Kierkegaard, Søren,1813-1855,Philosophische Brocken oder Ein bißchen Philosophie,Kierkegaard, Søren,1813-1855,Philosophische Brosamen , Deconstruction,Dekonstruktivismus , Gott,Menschwerdung,Inkorporation,Avatāra,Avatar,Awatara,Abaduoluo,A-pa-to-lo,Aboduoluo,A-po-to-lo,Gongen 

Similar Items

more