The Epistemic Parity of Religious-Apologetic and Religion-Debunking Responses to the Cognitive Science of Religion
Recent work in the cognitive science of religion has challenged some of the explanatory assumptions of previous research in the field. Nonetheless, some of the practitioners of the new cognitive science of religion theorize in the same skeptical spirit as their predecessors and either imply or expli...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
MDPI
2021
|
| In: |
Religions
Year: 2021, Volume: 12, Issue: 7 |
| Further subjects: | B
Religious Experience
B Epistemology B cognitive science of religion |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1764665295 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210727151851.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210727s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/rel12070466 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1764665295 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1764665295 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Stepanenko, Walter Scott |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Epistemic Parity of Religious-Apologetic and Religion-Debunking Responses to the Cognitive Science of Religion |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Recent work in the cognitive science of religion has challenged some of the explanatory assumptions of previous research in the field. Nonetheless, some of the practitioners of the new cognitive science of religion theorize in the same skeptical spirit as their predecessors and either imply or explicitly claim that their projects undermine the warrant of religious beliefs. In this article, I argue that these theories do no additional argumentative work when compared to previous attempts to debunk religious belief and that these recent debunking efforts are very much motivated by methodological commitments that are shared with canonical research. I contend that these argumentative strategies put debunkers very much on an epistemic par with religious apologists: both advocate responses to the cognitive science of religion that are primarily motivated by methodological commitments. | ||
| 601 | |a Episteme | ||
| 601 | |a Religion | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a cognitive science of religion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Epistemology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Religious Experience | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religions |d Basel : MDPI, 2010 |g 12(2021), 7, Artikel-ID 466 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)665435797 |w (DE-600)2620962-7 |w (DE-576)348219067 |x 2077-1444 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:12 |g year:2021 |g number:7 |g elocationid:466 |
| 856 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/7/466/pdf?version=1624594355 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12070466 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/7/466 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 12 |j 2021 |e 7 |i 466 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3958125204 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1764665295 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210727151851 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 210727||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||